However, it does not have an arbitrary
limit on block sizes, so we should see ETH prices recover quite soon.
Previously, there was an issue with these small transactions because with the
limits on block size, there had to be large transaction fees to discourage them.
Under any proposal, changing the
cap on block size would require a hard fork, meaning that such instances are likely to occur, perhaps regularly, as bitcoin scales.
He has worked closely with a broad range of people across Bitcoin's user, academic, technical, investor, and business communities from North America, Asia, and Europe, and according to the press release, Adam is a strong advocate for open source, decentralized technologies like Bitcoin However, his
comments on the block size of bitcoin and his general association with Blockstream and Core has made him a somewhat polarizing figure in the community.
Additionally, most of the Hong Kong developers have seemingly come to believe that short - term community
consensus on a block size limit hard fork is virtually impossible in the current climate.
The last Scaling Bitcoin conference drove down the price of bitcoin as the trading community saw a lack of progress in reaching consensus
on the block size debate.
There was a 1 MB limit set
on block size by Satoshi Nakamoto to prevent spam / DDOS attacks on the network in the early days and this limit was left there untouched as there was a lot of space before this limit could be reached.
However, his comments
on the block size of bitcoin and his general association with Blockstream and Core has made him a somewhat polarizing figure in the community.
For example, when Bitcoin Cash was created, it loosened the
rules on block size, making it a hard fork.
No, arbitrary
limitations on block sizes by a cartel of developers and high fees that force money out of private wallets and into exchanges are what is centralized.
BTCC's Samson
Mow on Block Size: The Bitcoin Community Must See Through Manipulation, Keep Calm and Write Code
The Bitcoin Core contributors present at the meeting agreed to
work on a block size limit increase hard fork to be proposed to the Bitcoin Core development team and the wider Bitcoin community.
There is also another proposal, Segregated Witness (SegWit), which would be adopted through a soft fork and raise the block size ceiling to ~ 4 MB and also allow for further protocol improvements like Lightning Network which would reduce the
burden on block size even further with off - chain open payment channels.
As endorsed by Core developer Peter Todd, bitcoin holders could
vote on the block size with the bitcoin they control, meaning the biggest stakeholders in the Bitcoin economy would have most of the influence on the block - size limit.
Satoshi Nakomoto, the shady inventor of Bitcoin, decided to place a
constraint on block sizes, which limits the amount of data that is transferable at one time.
Despite flourishes, including a softly lit image, that are sympathetic to Hearn, the piece includes the most
exposition on the block size debate, elaborating on Maxwell's own difficulties as a leading figure in the bitcoin community and detailing former Bitcoin Core lead maintainer Gavin Andresen's thoughts on the debate.