I did get a
half answer to my first question, in that many of them pointed to the books, Technical Analysis of Stock Trends, 8th Edition, and Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets: A Comprehensive Guide to Trading Methods and Applications (New York Institute of Finance) to a lesser extent, as definitive (and large) reference books on TA that give what they think is the overarching theory.
The subtle difference between these questions is that if the answer to the second question is «yes», then whenever heat is being trapped by an object, the object's temperature will rise; whereas a «yes»
answer to the first question only implies that the «trapping of heat» may cause a temperature rise, not that it must.
The answer to the first question lies within the latter.
And then secondly, if
the answer to that first question is yes, what do you think is driving the hostility to the term «entrepreneur?»
Initially, I assumed
the answer to the first question is no.
I wanted to amend
my answer to his first question.
I think there can be no doubt that
the answer to the first question is, yes; and the answer to the second is, almost always.
The answer to your first question is yes.
Second, in light of
the answer to this first question, how biblical is evangelical theology?
Stan, I think you know
the answer to your first question.
If
the answer to the first question is no, then we may say that no judgment of the form, «I ought to act in a certain way,» is warranted.
In
answer to your first question, no I don't have any certification / training in human nutrition, and I always try to be careful...
A: Hi Walter,
The answer to the first question is yes, they do work but the answer to the second question is no, the flavor is not the same as an outdoor gas...
The answer to the first question is yes, they do work but the answer to the second question is no, the flavor is not the same as an outdoor gas grill.
The answer to the first question is very simple if you look closely.
The answer to the first question is yes and the answer to the second question is no.
«I have no doubt at all that the answer to the second question will be yes - if
the answer to the first question is yes.
Well, it looks like
the answer to the first question is 63 or 32, and the answer to the second question is clearly 38 (228 + 4 + 38 = 270).
«We present our motion for debate with the belief that
the answer to the first question is «yes» and with clear proposals to enhance localism and tackle «Nimbyism».»
The answer to her first question is, «late May, 2015» (if this coalition holds steady, though I wouldn't put money on it).
To imagine
the answer to the first question, start by adding the number 2 to a prime.
In
answer to the first question, we analyze how the mode of drug resistance evolution changed within patients throughout the epidemic using historical HIV sequences.
In
answer to your first question, no I don't have any certification / training in human nutrition, and I always try to be careful...
The answer to the first question can be found in a fascinating conversation between Dr. Lee and Dr. Zava on our website.
Then ask yourself the same question, except this time replace the word «money» with
your answer to the first question.
The answer to the first question should be clear; in scientific terms, A Mind at a Time and The Myth of Laziness are riddled with error.