Sentences with phrase «physical arguments»

Authors concludes that — to the extent that we have simple plausible physical arguments that support the model consensus — we believe that one should have nearly as much confidence in these results as one has in the increase in temperature itself

By the same physical argument, one expects minima in the response to external forcing in the subpolar oceans, since these are being held back by their strong coupling to the deeper layers.

Alongside physical arguments that the great masses of ice, rock and water could not change quickly, paleontologists subscribed to a neo-Darwinian model of the evolution of species which argued that here too change must be continuous and gradual.

And there's the implied physical arguments in my ITCZ questions from earlier.

But some basic physical arguments lead to certain expectations about the temperature change distribution, from which certain other arguments can lead to expectations of other changes, and then there are feedbacks, etc... So, for example, I expect more rain.

I find it very worrysome that a natural scientist who presents a reasonable physical argument is publically accused of «reckless action» from political science quarters.

Seeing two teammates get into a physical argument on the field is never a good sign, and is often confusing.

While writing this section, you must concentrate on the physical arguments similar to the equations in the form of important cases.

It is ironic that in all of the physical arguments in our paper we are actually arguing that due to sensitivity of the stable boundary layers that actual amplification factors should be less than one.

Thus it seems to make little difference in this case if people are convinced out of trust / deference to a Milgrim - like authority figure, or because they understand the physical arguments.

The Achilles Heel of the «climate shifts are causing global warming» hypothesis is that it's simply not a physical argument, for several reasons.

Accomplishing this will require synthesizing multiple lines of scientific evidence, including simple and complex models, physical arguments, and paleoclimate data, as well as new modeling experiments to better explore the possibility of extreme scenarios.

My impression is it will be easier to predict the changes in the «amount of cold and warm» then the distribution of it for a given external forcing, though I'd like confirmation on that (although if I took the time I might be able to justify that view based on some physical arguments, maybe?)

«(although if I took the time I might be able to justify that view based on some physical arguments, maybe?)»

Now, it's true that many of us lack or let atrophy the fluency with differential equations necessary to follow some physical arguments.

«The current consensus is that climate change is not making the risk of hurricanes any greater, but there are physical arguments and evidence that there is a risk of more intense hurricanes,» says Myles Allen, head of the climate dynamics group at the University of Oxford.