Sentences with phrase «price for the player»

Firstly, almost nobody pays the initial asking price for a player.

You might put it down to whatever you like, but we paid a really high price for players who didn't care last season and I'm happy he's out.

Getting a good price for players helps the club no doubt.

See you paid a cheap price for this player, which allowed you to roster more consistent, higher price players.

This will lead to increased liquidity, improved pricing for players and a self - fulfilling cycle of increased business for the betting exchanges.

This is a hefty price for a player who did not make a single first - team appearance at the Brazilian club.

Yet we're looking at huge prices for players on the wrong side of 28.

But while prices for players have fallen, the number of features has risen.

It also sends the message to other clubs that we have a fully fit squad and don't need to pay over the top prices for any player we are interested in.

Bigger clubs have taught us that there are still bargains and not every club pays at an eye - popping price for a player.

And obviously our resistance to pay the asking price for any player.

Chelsea Man City and Man Utd have billionaire owners who pay over inflated prices for players for years..

Isn't it funny how Wenger speaks about crazy prices for players and hinting that this is the reason we are not buying certain players, yet at the same time we have trouble taking advantage of these crazy prices when we sell our players, most of whom seem to go for less than we paid for them despite this insane inflation of prices?

Shea cost Stoke City # 2.5 m, a decent price for a player who is just 22 years of age and certainly has the potential to be a success.

That doesn't look a bad price for a player known for his tremendous pace and finishing ability, and Arsenal fans would surely approve of this ambitious move.

# 15m would appear to be a very cheap price for a player of Isco's obvious potential in today's inflated transfer market so one wonders just how likely Chelsea are to complete a deal for such a sum.

Now we will have no choice but to be hosed on the selling prices for the players needed in the middle of the season, I just don't understand that kind of thinking.

According to the Express, Arsenal are prepared to offer the young Englishman # 100,000 a week to re-sign (and to persuade him to reject other suitors) but is that a fair price for a player that usually starts around 10 - 15 games a season?

I'm not sure if we need to fork out a fortune for every player look at city's average price for a player I bet it under 40 m but they get lots of them we get 1/2 and like Xhaka turn out bang average, we need a manager who spots talent

For me that is a great January price for a player (obviously talented) in the January transfer window for a position that we NEED right now.

Both players are reportedly hoping for weekly wages of around # 200,000 per week, which in the state that football currently is in, is about the right price for players of their quality, but for Arsenal's wage structure it could be challenging.

I seriously hope that he is talking about Arsenal, as I much prefer the idea of bringing in a 26 year - old proven performer than a 21 year - old who would be arriving on the back of just one good season in Ligue 1, especially as Monaco are demanding ridiculous prices for all their players, while Seri's release clause is just 36m euros...

Papa was named to manage the Kansas City Monarchs» B team in 1948, the agreement being that he would get one third of the sale price for any player who was developed by him and sold to the majors.

Jose Mourinho is interested in the highly rated 23 year old who is also said to be on Liverpool's deadline day radar though the # 20m asking price for the player does seem steep.

If we pay a premium price for a player, it will be for an Olineman.

Malaga may be forced to accept a smaller price for the player, given their current financial concerns.

Arsenal perhaps lock in a «cheap» price for a player whose value will probably increase as they mature and gain additional experience etc..

That's an absurd price for a player who is about as tasty as a piece of chewed gum.

At such a cheap price for a player coming into his prime it could potentially be a steal, especially considering that there are few right - backs of true class available at the moment.

The January window is small and short while prices for players skyrocket.

Once you in a position where you have a significant profit on the share price for a player you can then either cash in your profits and move on to another player or keep some or all the shares you have as they can still attract more media and performance dividends which can potentially mean even more profit!

Now you blame him, when others are offering more weekly pay for him, i think we should blame ourselves for where his head is right now, had we tied him up to a deal, this wouldn't be happening.And, we always offer peanuts for other players, and hike up our own price for our player, (Fab 40 mill, anyone?)

The Sun has reported that Sandro would most likely cost around # 70 million, which is a massive transfer fee for a left - back — one which will see the media criticise the club for spending another big chunk of cash with teams like Manchester City having a ceiling price for a player and seemingly make these options work.

Spurs fell short of the # 1 million asking price for the player recently and they aren't the only Premier League side chasing the player.

The mega-rich Manchester club have been flirting with Milner for some time now, before the summer World Cup in fact, and it appears the only stumbling block is Aston Villa's mammoth asking price for a player which only a few seasons ago cost them a third of what they're asking City to pay for the former Newcastle and Leeds United player.

It is clear that Daniel Levy is looking for a much lower price for the players he is targeting, so holding out as long as he can, but the risks associated are maybe unnecessary.

That's a pretty good price for any player — and especially one that has accomplished as much as Khedira has during his time in both Germany and Spain.

Funny though Arsenal don't receive inflated prices for our players.

The Portuguese winger is under contract in Manchester until 2018, so Inter would have to pay a fair market price for the player — believed to be approximately 10 million pounds.

United want to avoid selling another highly rated youngster and having to pay an exceptionally high price for a player they could have loaned out.

Wenger is right about the crazy prices for players but the reason the transfer prices have gone crazy is the amount of money available to clubs from the latest TV deal... of which Arsenal are quite happy to receive.

The Reds get a decent price for a player who might have fallen out with Jurgen Klopp.

It's not a bad price for a player who remains out of favour at the Emirates, despite the strong passion and boyhood love Jenko has for the Gunners.

Spurs are likely to be just as difficult to deal with as Liverpool, although there is a belief that Daniel Levy has a selling price for every player, even if it is likely to be over # 100m given that the White Hart Lane club got over # 50m for Kyle Walker.

This will lead to increased liquidity, improved pricing for players — and a self - fulfilling cycle of increased business for the exchanges (even better pricing for bettors, and so on).

Real Madrid will apparently allow Khedira to leave for a fee of around # 20m, which is a fairly hefty price for a player who by the end of the season will have just a year to run on his current contract.

He was on loan for 2 years from Porto, who notoriously ask huge prices for their players.