Sentences with phrase «principle of equal treatment»

When funding any school, whether public or private, the government should not surrender the longstanding principle of equal treatment for all regardless of religion.

Today's vote is a major step forward for the American principle of equal treatment under the law,» said PPFA President Cecile Richards.

The European Commission, which drafted the bill, argues that providers won't be allowed to do anything that violates individuals» right to access «a high - quality, open Internet,» and says it «enshrines the principle of equal treatment of all traffic, without discrimination, restriction, or interference.»

In my approach to global climate - control efforts, we will apply the principle of equal treatment.

Interestingly, the Court already noted that it is only during the first three months of residence that, by way of derogation from the principle of equal treatment set out in Article 24 (1), the host Member State is not under an obligation to confer entitlement to social assistance on economically inactive Union citizens (Brey, para. 66).

The problem was that the Austrian authorities based their rejection on the residential conditions and not on the derogation from the principle of equal treatment.

the fact that the measures were targeted at the oil industry did not infringe the principle of equal treatment.

Advised and acted in judicial review challenges for and against government departments raising issues of UK and EC law, including the principle of equal treatment of agricultural businesses

78 However, the absence of such an autonomous and uniform definition under European Union law of the concepts of social security, social assistance and social protection and the reference to national law in Article 11 (1)(d) of Directive 2003/109 concerning those concepts do not mean that the Member States may undermine the effectiveness of Directive 2003/109 when applying the principle of equal treatment provided for in that provision.

80 It follows that, when determining the social security, social assistance and social protection measures defined by their national law and subject to the principle of equal treatment enshrined in Article 11 (1)(d) of Directive 2003/109, the Member States must comply with the rights and observe the principles provided for under the Charter, including those laid down in Article 34 thereof.

In its defence, the Belgium government referred to two judgments of the Belgian Constitutional Court (judgment No 55/2011 of 6 April 2011 and judgment No 192/2011 of 15 December 2011), in which the exclusion of professions, dentists and physiotherapists was considered to violate the principle of equal treatment.

The question the Court needed to answer here was, firstly, whether housing benefits fall under the concept of social security and social protection, and secondly, whether the Italian authorities could limit the principle of equal treatment to «core benefits» of the social security system in such a way that it would exclude housing benefits.

To that end the award of contracts had to comply with the principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination and transparency.

In a decision recently published on the Swedish Arbitration Portal, the Svea Court of Appeal dismissed a party's challenge to the arbitral award, finding that the tribunal had not exceeded its mandate and did not breach the principle of equal treatment of the parties.

He concluded that there was no constitutional impediment to the court receiving the material for the purpose of informing itself as to the statutory history, the relevant considerations that led to the formation of policy, the aim of the policy in promoting the Regulations, and the existence of factors that might be relevant to the assessment of whether the Regulations were proportionate in their derogation from the principle of equal treatment of the grounds of age.

The employer can do so by showing that the undertaking's actual recruitment practice does not correspond to those statements; it is then for the national court to verify that the facts alleged are established and to assess the sufficiency of the evidence submitted in support of the employer's contentions that it has not breached the principle of equal treatment.

It is for the employer to prove that there was no breach of the principle of equal treatment.

The case is based on an EU Directive on «the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services.»

EU law takes priority over domestic law and it guarantees a directly effective right for all persons to be treated in accordance with the principle of equal treatment in relation to employment and working conditions.

The principle of equal treatment did not now require the CMA to replicate that mistake by way of the repayment of penalties paid by Gallaher and Somerfield.

Gallaher and Somerfield claimed that the OFT's failure to extend that assurance to any other Early Resolution party (and thus the refusal to make any similar repayments) was unfair and a breach of the principle of equal treatment.

In finding that the assurance was in fact made and that that the principle of equal treatment applied in these circumstances, Collins J nevertheless dismissed the claims on the basis that the OFT made a mistake in giving the assurance insofar as it was inconsistent with the principles of legal certainty and finality as they applied to competition infringement decisions.

«The Framework Directive confers on all persons, including police offi cers, a directly eff ective right to be treated in accordance with the principle of equal treatment in relation to employment and working conditions, including dismissals.»

The landmark judgment, P v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2017] UKSC 65, concerns the directly eff ective right of police offi cers under EU law to have the principle of equal treatment in relation to employment and working conditions applied to their circumstances.

The General Court noted that the Commission had a discretion concerning the choice of legal entities on which it can impose a penalty for an infringement of competition law (at [142]-RRB-, but that such a discretion must be exercised with due regard to the principle of equal treatment (at [144]-RRB-.

There are, however, some rules limiting the freedom of arbitrators to form the procedure and express their views on the merits of the case, like the principle of equal treatment of the parties, principle of independency, principle of neutrality towards the parties.

39 Under Article 2 of the Directive, the «principle of equal treatment» is to mean that there shall be no direct or indirect discrimination whatsoever on any of the grounds referred to in Article 1 of that directive.

However, in accordance with Article 1 thereof, the purpose of Directive 2000/78 is to combat, as regards employment and occupation, certain types of discrimination, including discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation, with a view to putting into effect in the Member States the principle of equal treatment.

The PIF Directive may nevertheless raise other legal issues, including the impact on the principle of equal treatment (e.g. to the extent some criminal offenses are subject to a different regime as to statute of limitation: it is not prohibited, but there must be grounds to distinguish among various offenses).