We believe that hunger is a symptom of the
deeper problem of poverty, and that food is our chosen tool for changing individual lives while addressing systemic failures.
The social scientists do, however, reveal a dimension of the
moral problem of poverty that the other three books neglect.
Unless we are talking about «good» marriages, getting couples married will not provide a solution either to
social problems of poverty or to individual problems of child behavior.
We are not going to solve
problems of poverty in Mississippi just by providing assistance to individual poor people one at a time.
is RECOGNIZING that the mayoral control «reform» — like previous efforts to change the system's governance without clearly articulating the educational purpose of the reform or facing society's deep
systemic problems of poverty and racism — still leaves the city with schools that fail to meet the academic, social and emotional needs of our students;
Two remarkable books that came out this year — Austerity Ecology & the Collapse Porn Addicts by Leigh Phillips and The End of Doom by Ronald Bailey — each makes the case that growth, technology, and accelerated modernization can solve the twin
global problems of poverty and environmental devastation.
The claim that there are more than thirty million Americans «living in poverty» only intensifies the distrust that is corrupting our public life and distracting attention from the very
real problem of poverty in this country.
New York Times Magazine editor Tough profiles an ambitious effort to simultaneously address the seemingly eternal
societal problems of poverty, class stratification, educational underachievement and racial discrimination.
It is meant to address the
immemorial problem of poverty through an economic formula utilizing culture as a creative weapon for people empowerment and to discombobulate the culture of corruption that will instil a mind - set of good governance and responsible citizenship.
JS: How do you respond to people who say these kinds of interventions are not enough to combat
systemic problems of poverty and that we shouldn't be putting our focus on parents or teachers?
I would refer to these children as the forerunner to — «global citizens / global humane beings» as it is they through the new approach of education will be able to address the
global problems of poverty, hunger, illiteracy, inequity, violence and ecological crisis.
Hawkins has also said that many of the problems with schools in disadvantaged communities are attributable to the broader
social problems of poverty and segregation.
As a result, I don't just disagree with liberal Catholics about
the problem of poverty in twenty - first - century America; I think they contribute to the problem by supporting programs that are ill designed and have many negative consequences.
Paul — like Jesus and probably for the same reasons — did not systematically address
the problems of poverty, riches and consumption.
The question is, will this method of dealing with
the problem of poverty work?
There is no possibility of solving
the problems of poverty and overpopulation in the poorer countries by bringing their per capita consumption to the level of the United States!
In Pursuit: Of Happiness and Good Governmentby charles murraysimon and schuster, 341 pages, $ 19.95 In January of 1964 President Lyndon Johnson's Council of Economic Advisers helped launch the War on Poverty by including in its annual report a chapter on «
The Problem of Poverty in America.»
In January of 1964 President Lyndon Johnson's Council of Economic Advisers helped launch the War on Poverty by including in its annual report a chapter on «
The Problem of Poverty in America.»
Politicians, heads of governments, international and national organizations, have attempted to address and eradicate / alleviate
the problem of poverty.
Consider this: we've had poor in our country since its inception, with Christian and non-Christian individuals and organizations acting charitably towards them, but
the problem of poverty remains and is getting worse.
It has little or nothing to do with
the problems of poverty and hunger which oppress all people in their daily lives.
They accepted the economists» argument that rapid economic growth, national and global, is required to address
the problem of poverty and that, with the attainment of prosperity, other problems could be solved as well.
People of good will to some extent saw that but were persuaded that
the problem of poverty had to be addressed as primary.
The social doctrine teaches that
the problem of poverty is best addressed by empowerment: enabling poor people to enter the circle of productivity and exchange in society.
My second argument is that even if by some measures vast growth does reduce the percentage of the world's population that is desperately poor, present policies will destroy the natural basis for our life together long before they resolve
the problem of poverty.
The problem is extremely complex, but a few illustrations will give a clear indication of the potential destruction of land, a trend that directly compounds
the problem of poverty.
Loosely, the term «green revolution» refers to the hope that by the substitution of modern agricultural methods and technology for essentially traditional ones,
the problem of poverty may be solved without any serious disruption of the prevailing economic and political systems.
Instead the statement differentiates between economics and politics and suggests that technology is the answer to
the problem of poverty and that a new form of government — the soviets — is the vehicle of freedom.
It now seems obvious to most Americans that «throwing money» at
the problem of poverty is not the answer.
Although they do not quite put it that way, the message of the povertycrats is that
the problem of poverty is unmanageable.
Or the role of schools and departments of agriculture in relation to
the problems of poverty and hunger.