Sentences with phrase «reply brief»

Presumably in an effort to get earlier and ultimately more attention from the Supreme Court clerks evaluating cert petitions, Samsung yesterday filed (once agai well ahead of a deadline) an optional reply brief in support of its request that the Supreme Court review the Federal Circuit's en banc decision in the second Apple v. Samsung case (this post continues below the document):
In a 35 ‑ page reply brief filed yesterday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, government lawyers argue once again that U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth's ruling was erroneously based on the conclusion that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines for hESC research violate a law barring federally funded research that harms embryos.
Parole is not back: footnote 3 of the SG's reply brief says the abolition of parole can be severed.
As WLF's reply brief points out, CFPB's position would upend the separation of powers.
The Log Cabin Republicans» reply brief Friday said that the Justices» review of that case was opposed by the other challengers based on the argument that the Court should await the development of a full factual record at a trial on the policy's constitutionality.
I'm delighted to see that CEI's lawyers have run with that last point in their own reply brief.
In their earlier Reply Brief, p. 11, they wrote misleading claims against (deceased) Stephen Schneider, to attack Hughes and Overpeck, starting:
Samsung's reply brief stresses the importance of the issues and particularly emphasizes that all three issues Samsung submits for review involve legal, not merely factual questions.
Mayer Brown partner Evan Tager said he was «disappointed by the reversion to a shorter reply brief.
The SCOTUSblog has published Samsung's reply brief in support of its petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) in Apple's design patents case.
On March 15, this 26 - page reply brief was filed in Chamness v Bowen, 11 - 56449.
In connection with Apple not addressing the real claim construction issue (the jury instructions on infringement), Samsung's reply brief says: «That is Hamlet without the Prince.»
Briefs from both sides have been filed, and the Court will wait for a reply brief and then decide whether to hear the case.
On June 21, the Alabama Constitution, Green, and Libertarian Parties filed their reply brief in Stein v Chapman, which challenges Alabama ballot access procedures for putting the presidential nominee of an unqualified party on the November ballot.
«All of our commentary will be presented in our July 13 reply brief in court,» he said in an e-mail.
February 2, 2017 — Teacher Plaintiffs - Appellants» Reply Brief to the U.S. Court of Appeal for the at the Ninth Circuit
See: State's Reply Brief and Response to Cross-Appeal at 10, McCleary (No. 84362 - 7)(discussing ESHB 2261, chapter 548, Laws of 2009).
Undaunted by the state's positions, CCJEF counsel fired back a reply brief with 329 pages of exhibits.
I was amused in court last Tuesday to hear one of the judges correctly say that the defendants «take [the investigations] apart quite thoroughly in their reply brief».
As our reply brief shows, that is simply untrue.
This case was leanly staffed, allowing me to work one - on - one with one of the co-heads of the Los Angeles litigation group and to take on key responsibilities in the case including an ownership role over drafting our motion to dismiss, reply brief, discovery responses and requests, as well as communicating with opposing counsel.
The Chamber joined with a coalition of business groups to file a reply brief in support of its cross-motion for summary judgment in these two cases concerning the listing of the northern long - eared bat as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act.
How far are we from A.I. being able to draft a reply brief that is more accurate, authoritative, and comprehensive than a seasoned lawyer could muster?
Apple's notice says: «This disclaimer moots Samsung's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, as set forth in Samsung's reply brief, that Apple's U.S. Patent No.
The petitioner's reply brief shall be filed by March 7, 2008.
This is exactly what Chief Justice John Roberts did in his reply brief in Intergraph Corp. v. Intel Corp..
For exemplary writing of an appellate brief, the Green Bag named Georgetown law professor Lisa Heinzerling and the other lawyers who wrote the petitioners» reply brief in Massachusetts v. EPA.
And, as detailed here, I was discouraged to see from the Acting Solicitor General's reply brief that the USSC is providing critical information about how many federal cases involve Blakely factors to DOJ and the SG without making that information publically available.
At the end of the reply brief, it becomes clear that Samsung's short - term priority is the «quick links» patent, which the Federal Circuit patent held not to be infringed but the other circuit judges, in their controversial en banc decision, reinstated the district court ruling and jury verdict.
According to Google's reply brief, it doesn't depend on any fact - specific determination.
Seila Law, LLC has submitted a reply brief in its appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in connection with litigation involving the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
You can access online both the Brief for Appellants and the Reply Brief for Appellants.
Right at the start of its reply brief, Samsung points to the «contrary [to Apple's position] view of nine high - technology companies, thirty - seven intellectual property professors, three groups representing minority and rural communities, two public interest organizations, a high - tech industry organization, and a small company that have filed amicus briefs in support of the petition.»
The petitioner is then granted a three - month period to perform discovery on the patent owner's supporting evidence and to file a reply brief or present arguments needed to counter a proposed amendment.
Unfortunately, Ross, and other AI programs, can't read those cases and summarize what would be helpful for a live case, nor can it write a reply brief, motion, opposition, or pleading.
Although you do not want your reply brief to be a mere reiteration of your initial brief arguments, you almost always will want to start with a quick recap of the arguments advanced in your initial brief — preferably a single opening paragraph before you begin your reply.
To perfect a claim to appellate fees, a like motion must be served before the deadline for the reply brief.
Some judges say they read the reply brief first, as it frames the issues to be decided.
Plaintiff in its reply brief presented a detailed spreadsheet chart replete with billings, billing rates, and hours of work expended by plaintiff's attorneys.
For a discussion of whether mushrooms constitute aphrodisiacs for the purpose of Valentine's Day, see the the Reply Brief for the petitioner in United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture, v. United Foods, Inc..
Below, we discuss the defendants» responses, in their reply brief, to the arguments that plaintiffs make on those key issues in their opening brief:

Phrases with «reply brief»

a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z