Secular humanists are people who do not believe in any religion or god. They focus on using reason, ethics, and humanity to understand the world and live a fulfilling life.
Full definition
somebody in the mainstream media has acknowledged there are countless numbers
of secular humanists out here!!
In this regard, these traditions have more in common with each other than with
secular humanists who seek to justify human rights on the basis of reason alone.
Why should conservative Christian beliefs carry more weight in the United States than moderate or liberal Christian beliefs, Muslim beliefs, Buddhist beliefs, or
secular humanist beliefs?
I'd LOVE to know what the true numbers really look like... I think it would shock a lot of people... and maybe get a little more respect
for secular humanists...
We are not here talking about people who have died in wars caused
by secular humanist states, because that would massively increase the body count.
What secular humanists don't understand is even their world view of equal human rights are built on New Testament principles.
Agnostics /
secular humanists believe their is no evidence that proves the existance of God therefore at this time the most rational and logical belief system would not incorporate a God.
Those who are Buddhists will follow one set of laws,
secular humanists on, Utilitarians on, Unitarian Universalists one (with a lot of variation), etc. «Atheism» in itself says nothing at all about one's ethical beliefs.
Assertions such as «The humanists have brainwashed Christians when it comes to the Biblical meaning of theocracy» or «Men will be ruled by God, or else they will be ruled by men who imitate God» (from the foreward to DeMar's Ruler of the Nations) remind one of the caricatures of the good - guy Christians versus bad - guy
secular humanists found in pop - evangelical books such as Tim LaHaye's Battle for the Mind.
The real struggle in all religious communities is for spiritual reformation opening themselves to enter into dialogue with other religions and with
secular humanist ideologies regarding the nature and rights of the human person and the meaning of social justice enabling to build together a new spiritually - oriented humanism and a more humane society.
By its own moral identity, any honest Jewish, Christian, or
even secular humanist society must come to their aid.
We would argue that, like
most secular humanists, he is cherry - picking whatever he finds personally comfortable from the heritage of Judaeo - Christianity while leaving aside whatever doesn't suit the tastes and fashions of the times.
No, over 180 million people have been killed by their
own secular humanist governments in the 20th Century.
secular humanists always conveniently forget that more people have been murdered by evolutionists in the last century than then entire dark ages put together, i.e.: Hitler, Stalin, Mao
It seems many atheists are agnostics or
secular humanists because if evidence of the existance of God was discovered than they would be open to reevaluating their beliefs and choosing accordingly.
When the Christian right attacked what was understood to be a recently
achieved secular humanist hegemony in American politics and culture, the thrust struck deeper than they imagined.
Instead of a ghetto, the underground Czech Church found an intense and fruitful dialogue with the equally
outlawed secular humanist intellectuals.
Why should
secular humanists just keep letting Christians get away with being as hateful and vile as they possibly can be.
Tarkunde is right in distinguishing between them, but he underestimates the inability of fundamentalism to embrace people of other religions or
secular humanists within their theological or community circle predisposing them to theocratic politics in the interests of «true religion and virtue»; and I would add that he underestimates the role of fundamentalism in India.
Mr. Secular humanist will continue to fund abortion Mr. Atheist will continue to rely on Christians for fund raising Mr. Agnostic could care less
I think spiritual or religious have no real differentiation when it comes to comparing to
secular humanist way of living.
Consequently,
secular humanists reject religious doctrine and divine revelation as the basis of public morality and decision - making.
According to Summit, a person who thinks evolution is a legitimate scientific theory, supports regulation of the free market, identifies with left - wing politics, and «seeks to empower the powerless, that is, women, minorities and homosexuals» is a
postmodern secular humanist with some Marxist tendencies.
Rorty, an
avowed secular humanist, writes from a position at the very center of the academic establishment, yet his book, in spite of its sometimes very technical discourse, is still widely discussed outside the academy.
At the same time we hear
prominent secular humanists conducting a campaign of propaganda in the media that seeks to blame the troubles of the world on «religion» in all its forms.
And if we look at the dominant influence shaping modern Indian public life, it has been the impact of Liberal or
Marxian secular humanist ideology.