Sentences with phrase «significant differences between the groups»

Thus there was no evidence of systematic and significant differences between the groups in terms of medication.

As any researcher knows, with such a large sample you are guaranteed to find statistically significant differences between groups.

The surveys were completed by 62 residents and 50 supervisors, and statistically significant differences between group preferences were observed in half of the scenarios.

On all outcome measures, the intervention group means were higher than the control group means, although statistical tests did not yield significant differences between the groups.

demonstrated a statistically significant difference between groups on length of time asleep, F (2, 28) = 5.16, p <.01.

PCA and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) results did not show significant differences between groups.

Consultants worked an average of 54.17 (SD = 15.09), HSTs 61.08 (15.47) and BSTs 59.63 (SD = 13.02) hours with significant differences between groups (F = 38.41, p < 0.001)(table 3).

After looking at the genetic samples provided by Fennessy, Janke spotted significant differences between groups of giraffes that needed to be considered when devising conservation strategies.

A small number of RCTs investigating stress management, group CBT or other psychological therapies compared with waiting list / usual care did not consistently find significant differences between the groups.

ANOVA confirmed significant differences between the groups (F (2,1743) = 39.1, p < 0.001) with consultants reporting significantly higher subjective well - being than both HSTs and BSTs.

Families who chose to participate in the program were compared to nonparticipating families; there were significant differences between the groups at baseline.

Unpaired Student's t test or one - way ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey's test was performed, as appropriate, to determine significant differences between groups.

One - way ANOVA identified significant differences between the groups (F (2,1739) = 15.47, p < 0.001), with consultants reporting significantly higher Self - Rated Health (SRH) than both HSTs and BSTs.

The most significant difference between the groups was on the aggressive subscale, with the control group scores increasing from baseline to postprogram and the PLL group decreasing during the same time period.

There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in deaths or hospitalizations from any cause.

Three months after the initial assessment there were no statistically significant differences between the groups on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire scores: 15.6 versus 16.0, mean difference − 0.37, 95 % CI (− 3.28 to 2.53) or Children's Global Assessment Scale scores: 64.6 versus 60.1, mean difference 4.49, 95 % CI (− 0.98 to 9.96).

ANOVA confirmed significant differences between the groups (F (2,1741) = 3.7, p = 0.026).

Limitations include lack of small sample size and significant differences between the groups at baseline on the child behavior measures, indicating that the randomization process may have been flawed.

As shown in Table 5, multilevel analyses found that, as rated by teachers, beneficial outcomes were generally maintained (as indicated by the lack of statistically significant differences between groups) or continued to improve following ROE completion, with one exception: Some of the ROE1 gain in prosocial behaviour was not maintained.

Just published in the journal the most careful, rigorous, and methodologically sound study ever conducted on this issue found numerous and significant differences between these groups — with the outcomes for children of h0m0 rated «suboptimal in almost every category

No significant difference between the groups existed for these practices.

For general clinical state there was also no significant difference between groups (5 RCTs, n = 2705, RR intermediate or bad outcome 0.98 CI 0.86 to 1.11).

But when it came to colicky babies — babies who cried excessively and inconsolably — there was no significant difference between groups (St James - Roberts et al 2006).

No significant differences between groups were observed at six to seven months in the risk of underweight (RR 0.92, 95 % CI [0.54 to 1.58], stunting (RR 1.20, 95 % CI [0.57 to 2.53]-RRB-, or wasting (RR 0.42, 95 % CI [0.12 to 1.50]; 1 study / 370 infants) or at nine to ten months (underweight RR 0.93, 95 % CI [0.64 to 1.36]; stunting RR 1.21, 95 % CI [0.62 to 2.37]; wasting RR 0.82, 95 % CI [0.39 to 1.71]; 1 study / 319 infants).

There were no significant differences between groups (helmeted vs. unhelmeted riders) with respect to other types of cervical spine injuries that were sustained: nerve root injury, cervical strain, or cord contusion.

No clinically important or statistically significant differences between the groups were shown in the trial assessing radiofrequency denervation for facet joint pain.

«We found a significant difference between the groups in their ability to learn a list of 10 semantically related words,» noted Dr. Chiaravalloti.

Results from the analysis of data from 113 children with non-severely infected eczema, published in the Annals of Family Medicine journal, showed no significant difference between the groups in the resolution of eczema symptoms at two weeks, four weeks or three months.

There were no significant differences between groups in the number of single fallers but more participants in the treatment group has multiple falls (49 percent vs. 35 percent), although this difference did not remain significant after adjusting for baseline frailty, the results indicate.

There was no significant difference between the groups on Day 3 of the assay suggesting that the amygdala was not affected by J147 treatment (Figure 1D).

Mouse body weights and food consumption were measured weekly, and there were no significant differences between the groups.

«Significant differences between groups were found for the separation anxiety component («My child is afraid to be alone in the house») and social anxiety component («My child is shy») favoring pet ownership,» the researchers wrote.

As a result of doing the same effective training program, there were no significant differences between the groups in total training volume or any of the other categories.

Improvements in squat and deadlift performance, respectively, were also observed in both control and T + groups, but with no statistically significant differences between groups.

There was no significant difference between the group that did and didn't do additional «homework» yoga.

This brings to light the fact that there isn't any additional benefit to be had consuming 600 mg 6OXO daily compared to 300 mg, and as concluded by the researchers: «for free testosterone, DHT there were no significant differences between groups, suggesting 300 mg and 600 mg of 6 - OXO to be equally as effective in increasing androgen levels.

Two years later both sets of mice will die happily of old age, with no significant differences between groups.

In fact, they found no significant differences between groups.

There was no significant difference between a group receiving intensive outreach and a comparison group on whether they had rehomed a companion animal in the last year.

Although there were no significant differences between groups, positive effect sizes (range:.25 — .40) were found for the COPE program with respect to maternal state anxiety at 3 of the 4 postdischarge time points.