Also when I checked references on medical literature, there was a lot
of sloppy science.
I don't feel it is the beginning of «coherent, sober environmental reporting», but rather more an example of
how sloppy the science has become.
I
think sloppy science happens because those at the top are letting it happen and I think they do so because the general population wasn't aware of it.
=============================================== Sea level rise grossly overstated
by sloppy science By Frank Bosse and Prof. Fritz Vahrenholt (Text translated / edited by P. Gosselin) In mid February a frightening report made the rounds through the -LSB-...]
He is the author of «Rigor Mortis: How
Sloppy Science Creates Worthless Cures, Crushes Hope, and Wastes Billions» (Basic Books, 2017).
If the current policy definition of LD creates a deliberately wide net, with seven possible disabilities, it also
invites sloppy science.
To deny these and myopically fixate on human CO2 (as IPCC has done) is
sloppy science at best and agenda - driven pseudo-science at worst.
Because if you can remember one simple rule, you can avoid getting tricked by mountains
of sloppy science.
It was
sloppy science: Researchers around the world were already testing powdered minerals for their ability to form ice, but they used minerals that were sterile and pure.
In part, he says, that may be due to
sloppy science, but it's also because «religiousness» is a tricky concept to quantify.
Sloppy science is unfortunate — inaccurate conclusions can be made honestly — and being to «fast and loose» with data forgivable.
Koch's «remedy» was either
sloppy science or outright fraud.
MCT, not only misdefines markets, but also seems to be
sloppy science.
but it is still
a sloppy science.
That is
sloppy science, at best.
I like when in the transcript he admits that he performed «
sloppy science», and then at another point he call the questioner «dude».
Roy W. Spencer, «
The Sloppy Science of Global Warming,» March 20, 2008.
In a nutshell... why do «you», support all of
this sloppy science, which has been shown to be the hallmark of the UN efforts & their AGW camp?
«The whole cosmic ray - cloud connection is a result of
sloppy science, some of it downright deceptive,» said Raymond Pierrehumbert, a climatologist at the University of Chicago.
A United Nations report on climate change that has been lambasted for its faulty research is under new attack for yet another instance of what its critics say is
sloppy science — adding to a growing scandal that has undermined the credibility of scientists and policymakers who back the U.N.'s findings about global warming.