Sentences with phrase «solar geoengineering research»

Scholars from developing countries call for greater say in solar geoengineering research, arguing poor nations have most at stake

A groundbreaking new CSPO project explores the potential for citizens to usefully inform the governance of solar geoengineering research.

The first is a call for more solar geoengineering research as a means to shed light on the distributional outcomes of envisioned futures with and without solar geoengineering.

It also includes the details of two previous attempts to bring solar geoengineering research out into the open.

One issue looming over solar geoengineering research is how — if at all — it will be used by society.

The document, drafted by representatives of the Oxford Geoengineering Programme, suggested some steps forward for governing solar geoengineering research.

The third equity - related rationale for more solar geoengineering research is the evocation of the 1.5 °C aspirational goal of the Paris Agreement as requiring research on solar geoengineering, out of concern for the global poor and those most vulnerable to the consequences of climate change.

Developing countries are likely to be the most affected by future climate change, research shows.Therefore, «it is right» for these nations to play «a central role in solar geoengineering research, discussion and evaluation», the group argues.

Jane A. Flegal and Aarti Gupta — Evoking equity as a rationale for solar geoengineering research?

«In solar geoengineering research, introducing sulfuric acid into the atmosphere has been the only idea that had any serious traction until now,» said David Keith, the Gordon McKay Professor of Applied Physics at SEAS and Professor of Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School and first author of the paper.

Peter C. Frumhoff and Jennie C. Stephen — The Siren Call of US Funding for Solar Geoengineering Research

We argue that what experts say and do to define and address issues of equity matters, because such boundary - drawing affects who is authorized to speak with regard to the advisability and contours of solar geoengineering research, and because the emerging visions of a smaller configuration of actors may have the potential to coalesce into widely - shared and collectively - held imaginaries.

In our research, we identify three sets of equity - related arguments advanced by sociotechnical vanguards advocating for more solar geoengineering research.

For these reasons, we analyze the content of expert understandings of equity and raise some questions about who and what gets excluded from expert discourses of equity in the context of solar geoengineering research.

Speaking to Carbon Brief last year, C2G2's executive director Janos Pasztor said developing a system of global governance for solar geoengineering research and regulation will «require more global cooperation than has ever been attempted before».

Evoking equity as a rationale for solar geoengineering research?