In 2000, Lawrence Lerner and the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation reviewed
state science standards in 49 states and the District of Columbia, specifically with respect to the coverage of evolution.
State science standards tend to cover evolution more extensively and better than they did nearly a decade ago, but at the same time, «creationist language» has become more common in them, concludes a review of the standards in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Sixty - one CSSS members across 38 states responded to our survey and reported that their work most frequently involves activities that attend to key components of their state's education systems, including: reviewing and
developing state science standards, designing state science assessments, and designing or conducting teacher professional development.
The Science collaborative is dedicated to the support of its members in the successful implementation of college - and career -
ready state science standards.
and goes on to add some additional variables, such as
new state science standards, required formative assessments in reading and math, a drop in student enrollment with an attendant loss in teaching staff, and a student demographic shift.
National Center for Science Education Deputy Director Glenn Branch told Business Insider in 2017 that, when it comes to
determining state science standards, «the two topics that arouse the most discontent and controversy are climate change and evolution.»
In the days before the Kansas School Board's August decision to strip the teaching of evolution
from state science standards, the presidents of the Kansas university system issued a statement.
We repeat his survey for all current standards publicly available as of May 2009 and discuss the history and role of
state science standards in American public education.
In our most recent review
of state science standards, published just a year ago, the Fordham team determined that the clarity, content, and rigor of most state K — 12 science standards were mediocre to awful.
Only 10 percent met
the state science standards.
For example, YPCCC holds up the case of Idaho, where state legislators argued that no section on human - caused climate change should be included in
state science standards, but instead arguments for and against a human role should be presented.
Even despite public controversies over the inclusion of climate change in
state science standards, «Americans overwhelmingly support teaching our children about the causes, consequences, and potential solutions to global warming — in all 50 states and 3,000 + counties across the nation, including Republican and Democratic strongholds,» according to the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication (April 11, 2018).