"Student performance" refers to how well a student is doing or how they are doing academically in their studies. It can be measured by factors such as grades, test scores, knowledge, understanding of material, and overall progress and achievement in school.
Full definition
According to the terms of the state deal, 40 percent of a teacher's annual review will be based on
student performance on standardized test scores.
They compared changes in
student performance in schools that had more experienced teachers who retired to changes in schools that had fewer experienced teachers.
Measuring student growth has been made somewhat easier by recent advances in the tracking
of student performance on standardized tests over time.
Schools that fail to make «adequate yearly progress» in
improving student performance on standardized reading and math tests for two years in a row are subject to the act's sanctions.
Your parent - teacher communication plan should be designed to set clear, consistent and high expectations
for student performance in class.
Requirements for
measuring student performance in instructional personnel and school administrator performance evaluations; performance evaluation of personnel for purposes of performance salary schedule.
There are many ways of
assessing student performance, but only standardized tests permit an accurate comparison of teachers, schools, and school systems to each other and to norms or established standards.
In this tier, literacy programs and resources, assessments, literacy block structure, and instructional methods are identified along
with student performance goals, best practices, and universal strategies.
For many teachers and the unions who represent them, there is a very real fear of
using student performance as one component in evaluating teachers.
Over the past decade he has led a number of significant reform efforts that have helped narrow the achievement gap and
increase student performance on both state and national assessment exams.
This academically challenging instructional program, accompanied by ongoing and intensive professional development and mentoring of teachers, dramatically improves
student performance at all grade levels in reading, writing, and language arts.
Evaluate student performance for a specific learning target when the student is ready, regardless of whether other students are ready to be evaluated.
In conducting this type of study, one must rule out other differences, such as those in family background or those in state education policies that might also
affect student performance over time.
The education standards were put in place five years ago to
raise student performance by setting the same goals as other states.
For instance, policies that focus attention on raising the achievement of low - performing students may be more effective than those that offer rewards for
high student performance in general.
Research on evidence use in school districts overwhelmingly focuses within schools on how school staff work with evidence
including student performance data, research, and information about teaching quality.
This allows the team of teachers to own responsibility for everything from
analyzing student performance data and developing interventions, to scheduling.
It is seen by experts as an important way to compare
student performance across states, which have their own standards and definitions of proficiency.
Certified teachers remain one of the best options for
boosting student performance, as school districts and the public consider alternative choices to traditional schooling.
This allows administrators to easily
monitor student performance at specific schools, compare general progress among neighboring schools, or track an individual teacher's qualifications and workload.
The provision would have mandated teacher evaluations that included measures of
student performance from the federal level.
We encourage parents to look at
student performance over various measures when understanding the academic performance of their child.
Ultimately, the charter school failed to meet
student performance standards, to meet fiscal management standards and to provide the district with specific reports and records.
This can profoundly alter the incentive structure within the educational system by measuring
student performance against an external standard, making performance comparable across classes and schools.
Measuring
average student performance reflects not only how much students are learning at school but also the knowledge they brought when they enrolled.
Multiple data sources are used to not only
report student performance but to serve as a source of validation, or an «audit» of local assessment processes.
Those attacks are compounded by the continuing chorus of criticism directed at teachers
when student performance expectations are not met.
Yet again, researchers have determined that paying teachers a bonus based on
student performance does not improve the achievement of those students.
It must be challenging to be pressed to improve
student performance while working with fewer personnel and with budget limitations on everything from supplies to equipment.
That is, under the city's formula, some teachers would always be rated as «below average,» even
if student performance increased significantly in all classrooms across the city.
She was tapped as a mentor because of
strong student performance data and positive peer reviews of her teaching based on classroom observations, along with her principal's recommendation.
Ironically, we are comfortable with a system that
grades student performance, but not the schools and teachers responsible for educating our kids.
Phrases with «student performance»