The phrase
"supposed evidence" refers to evidence that is assumed or believed to be true, but may not necessarily be proven or reliable. It suggests that there is a claim or assertion that something is evidence, but there may be doubts or skepticism surrounding its validity.
Full definition
It seemed to refute a long - cherished icon of evolution — and creationists quickly seized on it as
supposed evidence of evolution's wobbly foundations.
Heritage cites each of these examples
as supposed evidence of the proficiency of the private sector in advancing pre-competitive and advanced energy technologies to market on its own.
Let's not forget about when US Senator Jim Inhofe brought a snowball onto the floor of the Senate as
supposed evidence against the existence of climate change.
The Republican nominee offered up coverage of a spate of recent sexual - assault allegations against him as
supposed evidence the media was rigged against him.
Roddy Hackett demanded that Stone say something about
the supposed evidence of Hackett's IRA involvement and asked where the dossier was to be found.
I have read up on it and all
the supposed evidences for it are either proven lies (fish gills in humans) or don't meet the scientific standard.
What is
this supposed evidence that points away from Darwin's ideas and the extensive field of evolution?
Dr. Gyampoh also questioned why most of
the supposed evidence of foreigners on the nation's register presented by the NPP has «been limited to only areas close to NDC's stronghold, particularly Togo.»
These two men have been incarcerated in the UK for years without charge, and it has recently come to light that the Crown Prosecution Service was never given the vast majority of
the supposed evidence against them.
You can click on each product and see how it came to that determination, and
the supposed evidence for each component of that decision.
Attribution without detection probably means even though we can not detect warming reliably, we will attribute it exists based in lots of
supposed evidence that does not reliably find it.
It's clear then that
any supposed evidence used to refute perceptions of bias by the public are as scant as evidence substantiating it.
But the major issue with his case is that
the supposed evidence held against him had been destroyed by CSIS, and was likely unreliable in the first place, gained in part at least through coercive measures.