Sentences with phrase «terrorist offences»
"Terrorist offences" refers to criminal acts that aim to create fear, panic, and violence in order to promote a specific political, ideological, or religious agenda. These acts can include bombings, hijackings, assassinations, or any other act of violence intended to intimidate and spread terror among civilians. Full definition
Among these are many of those convicted of terrorist offences.
fatherhoodinstitute.org
Two were released without charge, while the remaining men were charged with terrorist offences relating to fundraising.
Abu Qatada, the radical Islamic preacher convicted of terrorist offences in Jordan, is to be released on bail in the UK within the next 24 hours.
As a result of the decision in R (Binyan Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] EWHC 2048 (Admin), the Divisional Courts made Norwich Pharmacal [1974] Ac 133) order, requiring disclosure by the foreign secretary of material which it considered was essential to a fair trial in criminal proceedings in the US for terrorist offences.
The terror legislation, the appeal court said, is imprecise and uncertain and led the police to define terrorist offences far too widely.
Although Canadian law makes some exemptions for freedom fighters and does not base terrorism convictions on objective fault, some Canadian terrorist offences are as broad as the American material support offences which allow convictions in the absence of a terrorist purpose.
However, it is also true that all attempts to charge and convict them of terrorist offences for more than 14 years, including subjecting them to legally questionable interrogation methods, failed to establish credible grounds for their incarceration.
Accordingly, Canadians should take this opportunity to demand the repeal of the sweeping and vague offence of advocacy or promotion of terrorist offences in general in order to better address threats to national security and to prevent unconstitutional violations of freedom of expression.
The suggestion that it may be appropriate for some terrorist offences is also utterly misguided.
Even more concerning was that only person on whom a control order was imposed was later charged with a terrorist offence, and even in that case he was not convicted.
It held that the definition of «terrorist offence» is clear and precise, as well as the definition of «serious transnational crime», since they are both listed by the agreement.
These specific terrorist offences in the Criminal Code simply do not require clarification or a separate offence to extend to terrorist offences that do not specify the exact manner or nature of the offence.
For instance, under the new provision, speech that promotes tax fraud benefiting a terrorist group can be a terrorist offence.
Not that drug and terrorist offences are not serious, but why on earth do brokerages have to enforce these rules?