The experts suggest that in case of divorce it is always better to go for mediation
rather than litigation because of the disadvantages it follows.
We are often able to resolve disputes before litigation is filed resulting in much lower
costs than litigation.
At the same time, the growth of Collaborative Divorce is primarily the result of divorce lawyers working for a better
process than litigation.
Using the services of a lawyer during this process is advisable, he adds, as this is likely to be far less
costly than litigation down the road.
This procedure allows for more challenges to patents of dubious quality because it is cheaper and more
efficient than litigation.
A practicing mediator and retired judge explains why mediation may be a better option
than litigation for high - conflict divorce cases.
I have always believed that out - of - court methods are better
than litigation in most legal cases.
Using mediation is faster and more cost -
effective than litigation, and, since you are in control of the outcome, produces workable resolutions with your input.
If both you and your spouse are motivated and ready to move forward, Collaborative divorce tends to take less time and cost less
money than litigation or more traditional negotiations.
This is far
different than litigation which typically involves parties communicating through their lawyers instead of with each other.
Evidence shows that where children are consulted during the mediation process, there are a number of advantages, thus it can be argued that mediation is better for
children than litigation.
This results in a process that is generally less costly and time
consuming than litigation and provides added value and hope for a positive future for the family.
For those familiar with the patents realm, it would come as no surprise that more than half of the patents filed are from patent trolls with no other
business than litigation.
The Collaborative Divorce model offers more privacy generally and more creative methods of dealing with confidentiality and
privacy than the litigation model because it was designed to be so.
Collaborative Practice is, however, usually more
advantageous than litigation, since efforts are more focused and there is less wasted time and money.
Mediation fees will always be far more
affordable than litigation — in the vast majority of divorce mediation cases, 80 - 90 % lower.
Thus, divorce mediation is far less
hostile than litigation, which is particularly beneficial when there are children involved, and is considerably less expensive than a traditional adversarial divorce.
While divorce mediation is far less expensive
than litigation given that you are not hiring two attorneys and blowing through your valuable time, it is still a valuable service.
This is quite different
than litigation where there may be a battle of the experts, which may impact your wallet and not provide the solutions you need.
The trend towards spouses resolving their family disputes through negotiation
rather than litigation is an inspiring and positive one.
Basically, there are 2 types of alternatives available to resolve commercial disputes
other than litigation, arbitration and mediation.
This would result in an easier, less costly dispute resolution
process than litigation and also provide consistency in the interpretation of the warranty legislation.
As detailed in his latest book, The Truth About Children and Divorce, nationally recognized divorce researcher, therapist, and family mediator, Robert Emery, Ph.D. has released his striking studies conducted with the highest scientific standards and contrasting the long term experience of couples randomly assigned to mediation rather
than litigation of their divorce or custody disputes.
While it is not guaranteed, the mediation process can be
quicker than litigation because it is focused on settlement from the beginning of the case and the parties dictate the pace rather than the court.