Sentences with phrase «than traditional publishing»

They are just as good and in alot of cases better than traditional published authors.

I'm beginning to feel indie publishing isn't that much different than traditional publishing in the long haul.

If you are capable of writing two or more books a year, indie publishing will allow you to launch your career much faster than traditional publishing.

A self - publisher controls all the steps and decisions of the publishing process, rather than a traditional publishing house making all the decisions.

You may receive better royalties than a traditional publishing contract, but you'll earn less than if self - publishing on your own.

I have decided, for now at least, that I'm going to pursue the self / indie - publishing route rather than traditional publishing.

But self - publishing is different than traditional publishing in 3 important ways.

For me, I know that I can sell 3,000 copies of a book and net $ 40,000 to $ 50,000 higher than my traditional publishing contracts that I used to live with.

But we had a group of indies that does pretty much require a different selling / buying method than traditional publishing.

With electronic publishing there are still some costs involved in scanning and proofreading, etc. but the costs are much smaller than the traditional publishing model.

Hybrid authors are more likely to choose self - publishing in their next books and tend to make more money than traditional published authors.

It has the potential to be very rewarding — I would argue that it has the potential to be even more rewarding than traditional publishing.

What makes digital publishing a more viable option than traditional publishing is that costs are usually much lower for digital publishing hence higher profit margins.

The good news for authors is that today there are many ways to publish a book other than the traditional publishing method, including self - publishing.

And it's important to note, because a self - publishing career is much different than a traditional publishing career.

I can price my ebooks at considerably less than the traditional publishing industry standard, because I'm not splitting the net with anybody.

Self - publishing will cost a bit of money, but it allows more freedom than traditional publishing and is a worthwhile option to consider.

For me, at this point, self - publishing is less of a risk than traditional publishing.

Given that paper accounts for a quarter of all landfill volume, it should probably come as no surprise that a recent study touted e-books as more environmentally friendly than traditional publishing.

BUT none of them are more appalling than some traditional publishing covers, particularly when you consider that these are for ebooks.

Even so, as a book reviewer, I've read indie books that are a whole lot more exciting, enjoyable, and just better than the traditional publishing world may ever allow.

So, for publishing purposes, anything other than traditional publishing fell under a «self - published» umbrella.

Self - publishing is much faster than traditional publishing.

Get answers to frequently asked questions like — Is self - publishing better than traditional publishing?

I'm not sure how this is any different than the traditional publishing model.

Because it would make more money than traditional publishing.

While there is certainly more risk involved than with traditional publishing, self - publishing potentially has far greater financial rewards than traditional publishing.

Better, actually, than traditional publishing in many ways.

Polka explained that preprints help researchers «accelerate discovery, find collaborators, gain visibility, and demonstrate productivity (for funding purposes or career advancement)» more effectively than the traditional publishing work flow.

E-publishing also happens a lot quicker than traditional publishing.

As informed, wise, and purpose - driven authors who have made the decision to employ the indie route rather than the traditional publishing route for your book, you're ahead of the curve.

Self - publishing is truly great but I have a feeling it's going to be another one of those things in modern life where just because you can do it yourself doesn't mean you will be happy with the result or that the end product will be on the same level of craftsmanship than a traditional publishing house.

Putting a novel into print indie publishing takes fantastically less «author» time than traditional publishing.

And I can tell you right now that for me, the economics of a collection work far better as a Kickstarter than traditional publishing, or even a straight eBook release, has for me so far.

The weblog audience is much smaller than the traditional publishing route, however the loyalty and enthusiasm of your audience is far more avid.

In that scenario, authors will partner with me 50 - 50; I'll do everything for free and guarantee them a bestselling book, and we'll spit the proceeds of book sales (basically, just like a traditional publishing deal works, except you'd be earning 50 %, which is much higher than traditional publishing contracts).

But I do say that many indie books adhere to a different aesthetic than traditional publishing and that aesthetic hurts them in the marketplace.

(Note that the contractual agreement between an author and a self - publishing service is quite different than the traditional publishing agreement outlined here.)

Not only is it possible for our entrepreneurial authors to get books to market far, far faster than traditional publishing does it (although many, alas, are cutting corners in editing, design, and other critical areas), but the going wisdom in terms of online discoverability is that one must have many works available, basically flooding the market with content.

publishing avenues now publish far more books than the traditional publishing stream from New York.

Self - publishing is not lesser or greater than traditional publishing — and visa versa.