Sentences with phrase «to burn fossil fuels»

That's equal to 20 percent of all the carbon released from burning fossil fuels in the past 200 years.

The excess CO2 we put into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, or natural gas is removed very slowly by ocean uptake and other geological processes.

The remaining 39 billion tons of annual human - made CO2 emissions come from other activities like burning fossil fuels in power plants and vehicles and producing concrete.

Consequently an increase in the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases from human activities such as burning fossil fuels leads to an enhanced greenhouse effect.

If the world keeps burning fossil fuels at current rates, things will be worse, faster.

This is roughly the rise predicted by climate change scenarios in which humans go on burning fossil fuels, to deposit ever more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

The primary way freshwater ecosystems absorb CO2 created by humans burning fossil fuels is likely different than what happens in oceans.

If we keep burning fossil fuels at our current rates, food may become harder and harder to grow in many places.

However, rising levels of carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels like coal are contributing to climate change.

Take a look at what happens on a chemical scale when burning fossil fuels.

Humans have added lots of CO2 to the atmosphere, mostly by burning fossil fuels such as oil, coal, and natural gas.

Then they'd quickly figure out alternatives to filling the atmosphere with burned fossil fuels.

The power plant wouldn't burn fossil fuels and would actually reduce the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere during the manufacturing process.

They also know that the buildup of the heat - trapping gas began when humans started burning fossil fuels to power industry in the 18th century.

We know the increase is due to human activities like burning fossil fuels because we can analyze the chemical evidence for that.

A person can ignore climate science, go with the flow, and continue burning fossil fuels like everybody else.

Their efforts have primarily been directed towards reducing CO2 emitted by electric power generating plants burning fossil fuels.

However, their effects are pretty tiny when compared to the warming caused by people burning fossil fuels.

But while forests are working diligently to clean up the carbon we have emitted through burning fossil fuels, deforestation is pumping carbon right back into the atmosphere.

Ask any kid that takes a science course, burning fossil fuels increases our immediate danger.

Could this make burning fossil fuels guilt - free?

We're the ones who burn fossil fuels and clear trees that absorb carbon dioxide, sending heat - trapping gases into the atmosphere.

As the main driver of climate change, the connection between burning fossil fuels and global warming is clear.

They also say the terminals would undermine the nation's greenhouse gas reductions by enabling Asian countries to burn the fossil fuel instead.

The CO2 pumped into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels today will hang around for centuries, building up over time and continuing to warm the planet.

You can't just bury your head in the sand and pretend you can just burn fossil fuels and not have to face any carbon price.

So even if humanity stopped burning fossil fuels tomorrow, the earth would continue warming for decades.

That's a huge reservoir, even compared to the rate at which humans are now burning fossil fuels.

There are many fun ways to get around town that don't include burning fossil fuels.

While burning fossil fuels puts a hole in our pocket books, it hurts the economy more broadly too.

Humans have been burning fossil fuels for only about 150 years, yet that has started a cascade of profound changes that at their current pace will still be felt 10,000 years from now.

They showed that reducing greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels also reduces the pollution that causes millions of premature deaths in societies around the world.

In urban environments, there is air pollution from infrastructure, buildings and vehicles burning fossil fuels, and from dust.

The three men, like many other high - ranking officials in the administration, have voiced profound skepticism about whether burning fossil fuels contributes to global warming.

Would everything be OK with continuing to burn fossil fuels until they are all gone?

Burning fossil fuels remains by far the biggest single contributor to the problem, causing 57 % of global emissions.

A problem is that markets for trading carbon dioxide focus on cuts in emissions at power plants and factories burning fossil fuels, not renewable energies which are viewed as green.

Burning fossil fuels needs to end in the same way that murder needs to end.

The agency also must calculate greenhouse gas emissions that would result from burning fossil fuels developed under the plans.

We need to stop burning fossil fuels entirely ASAP.

It's unfortunate that the costs of burning fossil fuels eventually outweigh the benefits brought from them.