Sentences with phrase «to explain the warming»

These factors, they claim, don't explain the warming of about 0.4 degrees C between 1976 and 1998.

It is very much the mainstream view in the climate research community that you can not explain the warming of the past few decades without anthropogenic and human influences on climate.

What we are interested in is the longer term less easy to explain warming period from 1920 to about 1950.

They can explain some warming early last century, but can not explain total 20th century warming.

It is very much the mainstream view in the climate research community that you can not explain the warming of the past few decades without anthropogenic and human influences on climate.

Rising CO2 [carbon dioxide] levels can easily explain the warming, but there is no alternative explanation that does not involve rising CO2 or predict further warming.

Their findings: natural influences such as changes in the amount of sunlight or volcanic eruptions did not explain the warming trends, but the results matched when increasing levels of greenhouse gas emissions were added to the mix.

The issue is not whether «climate denial» is right or wrong, but rather that the explanations pertaining to the greenhouse conjecture just simply don't adhere to well known physics, and ignore the physics which explains the warming of the surface by non-radiative processes.

This isn't a puzzle; climate scientists are well aware of several contributing factors, as a recent Reuters article — «Climate scientists struggle to explain warming slowdown» — eventually discussed.

Getting the «right» answer (i.e. explaining the warming from 1970 - 2000) for the wrong reason (i.e. CO2) simply has not been eliminated as a serious consideration, and hence an «extremely likely» conclusion is highly inappropriate.

Jochem Marotzke and Piers M. Forster have now explained the warming pause in terms of random fluctuations arising from chaotic processes in the climate system.

For example, there are not sufficient observations of the uptake of heat, particularly into the deep ocean, that would be one of the possible mechanisms to explain this warming hiatus.»

The urban heat effect has been discounted and can not explain the warming oceans, says Thomas Wigley, a climatologist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colorado.

Greenhouse gases alone can not explain the warming climate in the Himalayas.

Scientists have proposed several hypotheses in the past to explain the warmer Pliocene climate.

The dense carbon dioxide atmosphere often invoked to explain the warm era should have left its mark on the planet's geology, as carbon and oxygen sequestered in carbonate minerals.

Given that it can not explain those warming episodes and given that it accepts that CO2 did not cause those warming episodes, it makes its logical failure with respect to the late 1970s / late 1990s warming even more pronounced.

That would explain a warmer NH and a cooler SH than today.

I remember an article in SKS where it was stated that the orbital forcing did not explain the warming coming up out of the last ice age.

Climate scientists claim carbon dioxide emissions are driving the global warming trend since 1950, but they have trouble explaining warming that occurred early in the 20th century.

In contrast, I show that these cycles match the satellite record nicely and explain the warm bump of this period: Loehle, C. 2009.

Explaining the warming on the end of the LIA just says that it is getting warmer now because it was colder before.

Then, based solely on computers programmed to guarantee the outcome, they conclude with over 90 percent certainty that increased human CO2 explains the warming of the last 50 + years (1950 to 2007).