Sentences with phrase «to have one's baby in a hospital»

I was lucky enough to have my baby in a hospital with fantastic support including a lactation consultant, as well as easy to access community support.

A huge advantage to having your baby in a hospital setting is that someone else has to clean up the mess.

At the beginning of the 20th century the promise of safer and less painful labor by the medical community resulted in more women of the upper classes having their babies in hospitals.

More and more women are going back to the basics and choosing home births over having their babies in a hospital.

Going through childbirth in a medical birth center is essentially having the baby in the hospital.

Despite these statistics, only 30 % of women in the study had their babies in a hospital or health post (an «institutional birth»).

If I had it to do over again I would NEVER ever have a baby in a hospital for more reasons than space here allows to write.

I would never say that women should 100 % always have their babies in the hospital or at home.

In a new study, researchers looked at whether the results are different between women who have their babies in a hospital compared to other settings.

Many women began to believe that having their baby in a hospital with a doctor was much safer than at home with a midwife.

If you decide to have your baby in a hospital setting, you had better be ready for some confrontation if you try to do things naturally.

Certified Nurse Midwife Naomi Hannah, CNM, explains the midwife intervention rates when having your baby in the hospital with a midwife

I know that the majority of women still have babies in hospitals, but I would occasionally like articles about home births and midwifery.

The Bradley Method has been the source of confidence for many women having babies in a hospital setting where they have been able to have a natural birth without being pushed into interventions they don't want.

If hospitals truly were the safest place to have a baby and 99 % of the women in this country DO have their babies in the hospital, we should have one of the lowest maternal death rates in the world.

It is also a good idea to have your baby in your hospital room with you, sometimes called «rooming in.»

i've lived in holland — it is completely out of the ordinary to have your baby in hospital there.

I think women are either brave or severely underinformed about routinely having their babies in the hospital.

That isn't to say no one does research before having their baby in the hospital, but I know NO MOMS at all that haven't done lots of research before having a home birth.

In such cases, having the baby in a hospital provides the kind of safety net that provides for extreme situations where either the life of the mother or the baby is at great risk.

Although affluent and urban women began having their babies in hospitals, however, medically underserved populations, such as rural women with limited access to hospitals and poor women who couldn't afford to give birth in the hospitals, continued to give birth at home.

(I also mentioned that I personally had my babies in hospitals.)

Only after reading here and other places for several months have I gotten to a place where I can say that I will gladly have my baby in the hospital and get an epidural if I should happen to have another child.

By the 1900s more women were choosing to have their babies in hospitals so they could enjoy relief from the pain of natural childbirth.

Now while the majority of women in the United States have their babies in a hospital, more and more are searching for alternatives, like this place.

I'm pregnant with my second and plan on having my baby in the hospital, using en epidural, etc. (I know, all the bad things?)

Home births on the uptick Although the majority of women in Canada still have their babies in hospitals, the number of women choosing to give birth at home is steadily increasing.

Over the years, natural birth has become the exception rather than the rule when it comes to having babies: most women have their babies in the hospital, with drugs and surgery being all too common part of childbirth.

Just because you have your baby in a hospital, it doesn't guarantee that either the mother, baby, or both, are «safe.»

For someone who strongly believes in the power of UC, if they were forced to have their baby in a hospital and something awful happened, they'd have to live w / that consequence and would feel terrible about it.

If you have your baby in a hospital, you may have a blood pressure cuff on one arm, an IV in another, and the baby swaddled in quite a few blankets.

All you have to do to have a baby in the hospital is (1) go to the hospital and (2) proceed with either labor or a CS.

If you have your baby in the hospital with a midwife, the chance of you having interventions is much lower.

I would do the home birth again for sure, I never want to have another baby in hospital.

I didn't think anyone would ever want to take me as an apprentice, because I didn't consider myself «cool,» I had my baby in a hospital, and I figured there were other women that they liked better already waiting for the job.

If you have your baby in a hospital you'll have a midwife looking after you during birth.

«First it was, «I had my baby in a hospital, but I didn't have an epidural,»» said Tuteur, who doesn't support home births.

The FIRST thing she said to me was «You got what you wanted, I had the baby in a hospital!)

I know many more women who haven't done any research and have their babies in the hospital.

If you have decided to have your baby in a hospital or birthing center, ask if they have a birthing pool.

That is why I think the brave choice, the selfless maternal choice, is to have your baby in the hospital.