The discussion about inflation is tied into a mind - set that high government
debt leads to inflation and is therefore bad.
Short - term versus the long - term, we pick the short run...
leading to inflation away of debts, and loss of responsibility.
Yes, they recently were sold to Chinese businessman Li Yonghong which
led to an inflation in their transfer budget.
There are many, complex reasons why QE did
n't lead to inflation or hyperinflation, though the simplest explanation is that the recession was a strong deflationary environment, and quantitative easing ameliorated its effects.
You don't need to be an economist to understand that increasing the money supply
eventually leads to inflation, which in turn erodes the value of your money.
But I suspect, rather than competition for goods, that the longer term time horizon, will yield in retrospect, how asset bloat, and moeny printing globally, inevitably
did lead to inflation, if the world economy doesn't see deflation when the next shoe drops, as it yielded a tendency to need to support asset value increases, rather than of competition for good, in a world of grave excess capacity and savings.
In January, expensive
commodities led to inflation, higher interest rates in developing markets, riots in the Arab world, and lower economic growth.
And while the Federal Reserve could lower interest rates in order to diminish borrowing costs, this would
ultimately lead to inflation, and it would hurt the economy in other ways.
Societe Generale strategist Dylan Grice is concerned that as a result of the Federal Reserve's ongoing quantitative easing programs, all scenarios going
forward lead to inflation in the United States.
One consequence is that inflation fears could
lead to inflation through massive deployment of money into inflation - hedging assets such as commodities.
RT @TheLimerickKing: QE has
not led to inflation It's now a much worse situation Velocity's low But risk assets grow So now it's just wealt... Aug 15, 2013
«The benefits of tax reform, global synchronized growth, [and] employment gains will extend the life of our economic expansion and
eventually lead to inflation and higher interest rates.
It's interesting that Chair Yellen, while agreeing with the notion that tighter labor markets
generally lead to inflation, seemed to defuse any inflation - related concerns during the March meeting's question - and - answer session.
«It would
lead to inflation, price increases and in some cases shortages of food.»
That led to inflation (expected to reach 4 % by year end) and bubbles in the real estate and stock markets.
These are exactly the kinds of things that
lead to inflation, but we aren't in the business of guessing.
If central banks implement QE and increase the money supply too quickly, it can
lead to inflation.
In theory, higher pay can
lead to inflation: Companies raise prices to offset their higher wage bill.
It is perfectly possible to carry out QE for People without
it leading to inflation.
It's true people lending do expect to get back money plus some profit — or they should, if they are rational, which isn't true as often as you'd think — however all that does is
lead to inflation, and possibly more inflation after that, which I already acknowledged.
Why capitulate to the dismal doctrines of the Treasury and the Bank of England, that growth must be held back to curb the deficit and that reflation will
lead to inflation?
President Obama's administration is pushing to raise the nation's debt limit an additional $ 2 trillion, which currently stands at $ 14.3 trillion and issued dire warnings from business leaders that failing to OK the increase will
lead to inflation, an immediate doubling of «Interest Rates» and a killer «Wall Street Crash» — House Speaker John Boehner, R - Ohio, says the GOP will demand trillions in spending cuts before considering an increase in the debt ceiling.
This is
leading to inflation in China, Australia, and many other places, as the deflationary effects of adding new labor to the global capitalist labor pool gets outweighed by the hyperactive printing press.
Uses an example from the 1812 - 1820 period, where small Treasury notes expand the monetary base,
leading to inflation, a run for gold, and later a collapse.
William McChesney Martin caved when LBJ pushed him (perhaps beat him physically), and lowered rates in 1965,
leading to inflation.
An overheated economy can
lead to inflation, and investors begin to worry that the Fed may have to raise interest rates, which would hurt bond prices even though yields are higher.
That should
lead to inflation, which results in the decline of paper money as an asset.
Even if there have been some times where monetizing debt has not
led to inflation, the odds are really low that that happens historically.
All that said, we have a punk economy, but what will happen if we get a large increase in bank lending,
leading to inflation.
In the midst of this the FOMC began raising the fed funds rate higher and higher as they feared economic growth would
lead to inflation, with rising long rates a possible sign of higher expected inflation.
If capital expenditure continues to be used to replace reserves could
this lead to the inflation of a carbon bubble which would have to be corrected in a scenario of sudden drastic action to prevent dangerous climate change?