Sentences with phrase «to remove ineffective teachers»

At a time when the rhetoric around new teacher - evaluation systems has focused on removing ineffective teachers from the classroom, some question whether the ranking structure makes sense.

It's undeniable that many principals today don't take advantage of the flexibility they already have to remove ineffective teachers before they earn tenure.

They usually prevent principals from removing ineffective teachers without working through prolonged, tedious, arcane procedures.

States and districts can eliminate seniority - based layoffs, which should consider effectiveness instead, and make it easier to transfer or remove ineffective teachers who can not improve.

Now several Republican governors have concluded that removing ineffective teachers requires undoing the century - old protections of tenure.

Another group of laws creates procedural impediments that make removing an ineffective teacher so onerous and costly that it is rarely done.

Proponents of the California effort posit that the state's dismissal laws create a process for removing ineffective teachers that has myriad steps, takes years of documentation, and has a price tag in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, leading to an average annual dismissal rate of 0.0008 percent.

As a chancellor who became well known for firing more than 20 teachers during her first year on the job, Rhee stood by her position on the importance of recruiting and retaining effective teachers while removing ineffective teachers.

They have targeted strategies to get strong teachers and leaders into high - poverty / high - minority schools and can swiftly remove ineffective teachers; they are closing low - performing schools and offering high - quality choices through both traditional and charter schools; and they have adopted demanding graduation standards and assessments so that students leave high school capable of attending college and ready for careers.

And I know plenty of teachers — so I assume she does too — who agree with today's focus on removing ineffective teachers from the classroom: they understand that bad / abusive teachers are a HUGE problem, and that the impact they have on children and schools is devastating.

If the purpose of teacher evaluation is to support teachers» professional development and occasionally remove ineffective teachers from the classroom, then it's clear that we have a long way to go before we create a system that's useful.

«Californians want their children's teachers to succeed and want to give them every tool possible to succeed, but they are also willing to take stronger steps to remove ineffective teachers in the classroom,» said Dan Schnur, the poll director and executive director of the Unruh Institute of Politics of USC.

Lawsuit Against Teacher Tenure Laws, Seniority Rights Advances Supporters of a lawsuit to make it easier to remove ineffective teachers hailed a court ruling Friday that will allow them to proceed with efforts to overturn teacher tenure laws and seniority rights.

Removing ineffective teachers without developing an expanded pool of effective teachers to replace them is unlikely to deliver desired improvements in education, particularly in high poverty schools which already face staffing challenges.

States and districts can establish a policy of «mutual consent» that gives principals the right to choose their own teachers... States and districts can eliminate seniority - based layoffs, which should consider effectiveness instead, and make it easier to transfer or remove ineffective teachers who can not improve.»

Judge Treu found that this time period was far too short to exclude ineffective teachers, and that the job security protections made it onerous to remove ineffective teachers from classrooms.

Cuomo took up the mantle, proposing in his State of the State speech in 2015 to «reform the process to make it easier, fairer and faster to remove ineffective teachers from the classroom.»

Mr. de Blasio pointed to his own efforts to remove ineffective teachers, saying the city had removed 289 of them.

Mayor Bloomberg in his State of the City address on Jan. 12 proposed merit pay for teachers, vowed to step up efforts to remove ineffective teachers, blamed the union for the breakdown of negotiations over a teacher evaluation system in 33 restart and transformation schools and announced that he would open 50 new charter schools in the next two years.

Similarly, when it becomes necessary to fill a classroom vacancy or to remove an ineffective teacher, district officials are often hobbled by contract language.

Thus, the union leadership reluctantly embraced a reform - minded contract that will make it much easier to remove ineffective teachers from the classroom.

And finally, after this long and circuitous route, districts will adopt critical changes, such as those that make it much easier to remove ineffective teachers (or principals or staff) from their jobs.

And sure enough, just last week, Washington's union leadership reluctantly embraced a reform - minded contract that will make it much easier to remove ineffective teachers from the classroom.

Iron - clad seniority and tenure rights codified in state laws and collective bargaining agreements make it nearly impossible for boards to remove ineffective teachers.

The cost saving from removing ineffective teachers is minor in comparison to the significant cost savings from not wasting resources on students that have been scientifically identified as ineffective students.

Under a state - appointed superintendent, the district pursued a wide - ranging reform agenda, including a major new teacher contract and evaluation system intended to retain and reward the district's effective teachers and remove ineffective teachers from the classroom.

An earlier version of the bill required firing principals at low - performing public and private schools, and removing ineffective teachers and possibly replacing them with unlicensed ones.

Cuomo took up the mantle, proposing in his State of the State speech in 2015 to «reform the process to make it easier, fairer and faster to remove ineffective teachers from the classroom.»

The thrust of the students» case is that five state statutes make it difficult and expensive to remove ineffective teachers from the classroom.

But cooperative relationships are difficult to maintain when principals must use underhanded methods to remove ineffective teachers, and when bad teachers undermine staff morale.

More importantly, it is important for school board members to be cognizant that removing ineffective teachers may cause resistance within a school.

At the same time board members must understand that removing ineffective teachers is also critical to increasing academic achievement in a challenged school.

Students say they agree that the laws should have been changed to make it easier to remove ineffective teachers, but that they saw tenure as one of the few perks available to them in a profession not known for its lucrative pay.

They have also removed tenure provisions, making it easier to remove ineffective teachers.

«The current system in Michigan doesn't provide for an expedited way to remove ineffective teachers,» Tim Melton, the only Democratic state representative to speak in favor of the bills, told The Huffington Post.

However, it noted that there was clear testimony that tenure as implemented in North Carolina did not impede administrators from removing ineffective teachers.

He is quoted as adding, «Teachers who do not improve after being given the opportunity and tools to do so are the ones who should no longer be in the classroom... This [emphasis added] is the system we should be using to remove ineffective teachers.»

This would seem to make it easier to remove ineffective teachers, because the agreement calls for a teacher's removal if judged ineffective two years in a row, and, as such, it's a reform that would have been unimaginable four months ago when the first - round application was filed — or even two months ago, when Mulgrew and I had breakfast.

Education reformers insist they help to identify and remove ineffective teachers, while offering more feedback for teachers to improve their practice.

In most states, it can take a lot of documentation and tireless work on the part of administration to remove ineffective teachers, but the other teachers in the building will notice your tenacity in holding people accountable.

Under less friendly questioning than earlier in the day, Deasy responded in detail to questions posed by Jim Finberg, attorney for the California Teachers Association (CTA) and the California Federation of Teachers (CFT), who attempted to chip away at the argument that the current tenure and dismissal statutes hurt students, and that removing ineffective teachers is quite possible now.