When people
say such things as, «A great work of art is a joy for ever», I say, «Well, there is no for ever».
Either way, if you can read the plainly written word, you can see I didn't come close to
saying such a thing in my comment.
But I just don't believe that anyone could be so stupid as to
say such a thing over the internet, using a computer.
Yet when they do this, we tend to ignore what they say, because we believe they are
only saying such things from spite and anger.
For somebody to have come out and
said such things means clearly she is even working against the government and she will not want that government to succeed.
Anyone who
says such things misses that once scientists publish their results, anyone — you, me, anyone — can use the results to work on global warming.
It never pays to
say such things in your profile, as it will turn off women faster than you know.
The notion that there can not be purpose in living without a god is only indicative of a lack of imagination on the part of the
person saying such a thing.
He doesn't want to tell people how to live their lives, and therefore wants there to be as few rules as possible in the OASIS (for the sake of argument, we'll ignore the inherent contradiction
of saying such things about a computer program written in code).
(Skeptical Science) When these politicians are asked about the basis for their positions on climate change, they almost always respond
by saying such things as they «have heard that there is a disagreement among scientists» or similar responses that strongly suggest they have informed an opinion on climate change science without any understanding of the depth of the scientific evidence on which the scientific consensus view 0f climate change has been based.
Again, pronouns are different here, causing no small amount of trouble: people have a hard
time saying such things as «between him and her» or «to him and me» — but that's another story.)
In mentoring other Native American students, it is important to
say such things because we are often categorized as primitive people who are expected to get lost in the cracks of modern society.
(not that you've
said any such thing so far, but it's a common statement I've heard from many christians so I'm heading it off at the pass)(you didn't open your heart enough, you weren't truly contrite, you didn't turn away from your sin, etc..)
The president also claimed that Comey had said there was no evidence of collusion between his aides and Russia, though
Comey said no such thing.
Since the
Bible says no such thing, and the minister knows it, what does he do or say after first trying to understand Mr. Jones's meaning and accepting Mr. Jones as a person?