Sentences with phrase «trial court decision»

He handles appeals in both state and federal courts, representing clients seeking to affirm a favorable trial court decision as well as those whose goal it is to obtain a reversal.

Watts v Polaczyk 242 Mich App 600; 619 NW2d 714 (2000)(affirming trial court decision to grant summary disposition to client and determining that arbitration clauses in attorney retainer agreements are enforceable)

Special Properties v Woodruff 273 Mich App 586; 730 NW2d 753 (2007)(reversing trial court decision granting summary disposition to plaintiff and remanding for entry of judgment in favor of defendant on quiet title action)

Organization The bulk of trial court decisions that are appealed are never heard by the Supreme Court.

That paved the way for a bizarre 2011 trial court decision holding that the state was underfunding education by billions of dollars each year.

Note: In the CCJEF trial court decision, now on appeal, Judge Moukawsher, in contrast to all precedents across the country, limited the notion of adequacy to comprise only sufficient teachers, facilities and instrumentalities of learning - and he said the state is already providing adequate funding.

On appeal, the Jones trial court decision was affirmed.

The case law frequently cites two British Columbia trial court decisions.

Despite these decisions at the Appeal level, many trial Court decisions continued to use this third option.

@user6726 Appellate decisions are absolutely more authoritative than trial court decisions when they are available, but in any particular incident, the trial court is the first body to make an authoritative interpretation of the relevant law as applied to those particular facts in that particular case.

the case name used in the first trial court decision should be used for all decisions made in the same case, from the originating court or tribunal to the last appeal.

Tyra v Organ Procurement Agency of Michigan 498 Mich 68; 869 NW2d 213 (2015)(reversing Court of Appeals and reinstating trial court decision to grant summary disposition to client on statute of limitations grounds because plaintiff failed to follow notice of intent requirements after clarifying interaction between MCL 600.1901, 600.2301 and 600.2912 b)

Greg has also won appeals in both Minnesota and Wisconsin, including reversals of final trial court decisions.

Prevailed before the Appellate Court which affirmed a Superior Court trial court decision denying a writ of mandamus filed against a Connecticut Probate Court judge.

Even systems that boast comprehensiveness probably do not have trial court decisions for all the jurisdictions for which they have appellate decisions.

California trial court decisions provide a solid basis for a Cerveny - like preemption argument.

In Berthod REALTORS ®, Inc. v. J.W. Riker - Northern Rhode Island, Inc., the Supreme Court of Rhode Island addressed its standard of review for arbitration hearings and trial court decisions thereon.

Tobias v Archbold Michigan Court of Appeals Docket No 241048 (December 4, 2003)(affirming trial court decision to grant summary disposition to clients on quiet title action)

Opus One, Inc v Cross Wrock, PC Michigan Court of Appeals Docket No 222128 (December 1, 2001)(reversing trial court decision and granting client's motion to change venue under MCL 600.1629)

She appealed that decision to the Florida court that reviews trial court decisions, and they agreed with her.

Its supporters deftly used the trial court decision in Lobato to generate support for the bill.

This past May, the court roundly rejected the trial court decision.

After the trial court decision in 2014, support for fair treatment of California's teachers poured in from across the state and nationwide.

This is a trial court decision, and the Plaintiffs will have the opportunity to appeal to the Maine Law Court.

We have previously blogged about the trial court decision where a jury found Forcillo guilty of attempted murder in the death of 18 - year - old Sammy Yatim («Yatim»).

A Mississippi Appeals court recently affirmed a trial court decision to throw out a Wal - Mart premise liability case involving a damaged container and corrosive burns.

Read the quote in context by following Williams» links to the Illinois Court of Appeal's affirmation of the trial court decision in City of Chicago v. American Cyanamid Co. et al..

Add your jurisdiction's Court of Appeal and trial courts decisions, federal and provincial legislative changes, tribunal decisions, municipal and other delegated legislation and you have way more material than any generalist can reasonably consume.

Recently Mr. Forteith was successful in getting the Dallas Court of Appeals to entirely reverse a trial court decision allowing his client to obtain a fair result in his slip and fall case.

The Trial Court Decision Below The trial court agreed with the nursing home and dismissed the case.

Craig v Silverman Michigan Court of Appeals Docket No 265155 (April 21, 2006)(affirming trial court decision to grant summary disposition to client on legal malpractice action arising out of medical malpractice case)

Ruby Associates v Shore Financial 276 Mich App 110; 741 NW2d 72 (2007), vacated in part, affirmed in part, 480 Mich 1107, 745 NW2d 752 (2008)(affirming trial court decision to grant summary disposition to client in quiet title action)

Hunters Square Office Bldg, LLC v Paragon Underwriters, Inc Michigan Court of Appeals Docket No 235115 (May 20, 2003)(affirming trial court decision to grant judgment in favor of client in dispute arising out of notice provisions of commercial lease agreement)

Lyons v Kinsel Court of Appeals Docket Nos 329584, 329597, 329607 (April 25, 2017)(affirming trial court decision to deny summary disposition for lack of personal jurisdiction)

Karam v Law Offices of Ralph J Kliber 253 Mich App 410; 655 NW2d 614 (2002)(affirming trial court decision to grant summary disposition to client and defining limited scope of duties that attorneys owe to non-clients when preparing testamentary documents)

Stasson v Paragon Michigan Court of Appeals Docket No 269997 (December 13, 2006)(granting motion to affirm trial court decision to grant summary disposition to client on breach of insurance contract claim)

Sexton v Sumner Michigan Court of Appeals Docket No 204192 (August 24, 1999)(affirming trial court decision to grant summary disposition to client on legal malpractice action arising out of claim and delivery action)

Berman v Ribitwer Michigan Court of Appeals Docket No 246870 (August 17, 2004)(affirming trial court decision to grant summary disposition to client on legal malpractice action arising out of divorce action)

Tupper v Lebeuf Michigan Court of Appeals Docket No 229869 (August 6, 2002)(reversing trial court decision to grant summary disposition on statute of limitations grounds)

Oesterle v Wallace 272 Mich App 260; 725 NW2d 470 (2006)(affirming trial court decision to grant summary disposition for client and defining scope of litigation privilege)

Boladian v Thennisch Michigan Court of Appeals Docket No 324737 (April 12, 2016)(affirming trial court decision to grant summary disposition to client on abuse of process and malicious prosecution claims)

Represented on appeal and remand a nationally prominent attorney in litigation seeking a share of a fee exceeding $ 100 million, obtaining reversal of a trial court decision dismissing the action.

Municipal ordinances and regulations and trial court decisions are the last mile of primary law available electronically.

The decision is now in, and we've prevailed — the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court decision allowing Avvo to resist the subpoena seeking to unmask its anonymous commenter.

Perhaps the trial court decision about divorce, alimony, child custody, visitation, child support, property division and monetary award, or other family law issue is confusing or unfavorable to you and you're not sure about your rights.

The appellate court upheld the trial court decision, saying that the state's seller disclosure statute did not impose a duty on brokers to independently verify or disclaim the accuracy of a seller's representations.