Sentences with phrase «trial court judgment»

Court reversed trial court judgment in favor of plaintiffs, holding that defendants could not be held liable for conspiring to interfere with contractual relations because they were a party to the contract.

Reversed trial court judgment in favor of a defendant where court improperly relied on the doctrine of frustration of purpose.

For me this is still a bit of a head scratcher: the engineering is highly sophisticated but the coverage is so spotty as to make it of small use in many cases; certainly someone in Ontario, for example, is unlikely to get much joy from it, given the absence of trial court judgments.

Appeals judges generally resist overruling trial court judgments, instead, preferring to give trial judges the benefit of any doubt.

A: The earlier trial court judgment acknowledged that there was this much earlier decision called Gold Seal, where the Supreme Court took a narrower understanding of Section 121.

The risks of predicting a trial court judgment are compounded if the claim goes on appeal where appeal court judges frequently place an importance on facts not regarded as important by the trial judge.

While the other side will sometimes waive recovering these costs if you do not prevail, in particular if you agree not to appeal the trial court judgment, there is no guarantee.

We can evaluate the issues for your case to help ensure a trial court judgment has a predictable outcome on appeal.

The firm was successful in overturning a trial court judgment that adversely impacted title to all property in Florida when a foreclosure sale is involved.

On July 18, 2013, the Austin Court of Appeals issued a memorandum opinion affirming in part a trial court judgment which held that a stable employees» smoking while working in the barn was a material breach of the boarding agreement, allowing several boarders to move out without notice.

In Brown v. Wheeler, the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland affirmed the trial court judgment holding in favor of defendant because plaintiff failed to allege or show that: (1) landlord had actual knowledge or reason to know of the presence of chipping, peeling, and flaking lead paint and that such condition was hazardous, and (2) landlord was given reasonable opportunity to correct hazard.

The court affirmed the trial court judgment holding in favor of defendant because plaintiff failed to allege or show that: (1) landlord had actual knowledge or reason to know of the presence of chipping, peeling, and flaking lead paint and that such condition was hazardous, and (2) landlord was given reasonable opportunity to correct hazard.