These arguments were the
same types of arguments deployed by environmentalists earlier in the century defending some corner of the national park system or attempting to preserve a beautiful landscape.
The conscious judgment that a certain argument or a
certain type of argument is invalid is first the product of unconscious thought.
No hard feelings, I would write the same thing if you would have said the same
type of argument against a Muslim, Jew, Atheist, etc..
These evidences remain very important; but, whether we like it or deplore it, the
older type of argument for Christianity based upon the documents and traditions and heroism of the age of the Apostolic Fathers has no longer the evidential power of former days.
«When I was doing those TV debates it sometimes felt like I was up against a quasi-religious rock concert, where no matter what truth you told it didn't really matter in a
post-truth type of argument in the politics.»
This is statistical gibberish as they are substituting serious analysis with a
new type of argument «appeal to spam», as in spamming journals.
4) Wine inside stays fresher longer (when opened) This is one of those glass - half - empty, glass - half -
full type of arguments that to the cynically - minded might border on greenwash.
One is the «different voice theory,» the notion that women «will construct
different types of arguments than male attorneys, and the male - dominated U.S. Supreme Court will be less receptive to arguments presented by women attorneys.»
Mr. Brown: First, you learn
which types of arguments are likely to be effective and which are likely to turn the judge off.
Richard Gaskins, in his book Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse -LRB-(Yale University Press: New Haven, 1992), examines the ways in which both burdens of proof and
types of arguments well established in law are borrowed or at least adopted by other academic disciplines.
Pick Your Battles Wisely - This is an obvious one, but I think that it may be the king of preventing all those little
bickering types of arguments.
These types of arguments are unhelpful because it's like asking what would happen if everyone started exercising regularly, eating right, saving money, avoiding credit card debt and compromising on their political views.
This type of argument is commonly used by drugmakers to justify high price tags.
Instead of wasting our time on
these types of arguments inside our little Christian world, maybe we should look inside ourselves this Easter.
Who, exactly, makes
the type of argument coming in for criticism here?
Ad hoc is not
the type of argument that is practiced by logical thinkers.
«A straw man or straw person, also known in the UK as an Aunt Sally, [1][2] is
a type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.
The larger problem that I have with
this type of argument is that the evidentiary issues re: God have been very thoroughly argued out by 2500 years of philosophers, some of whom must have been the most intelligent people ever to occupy the Earth.
It makes
these types of arguments incredibly complicated, because everyone means something different when they use words like «faith», «proof», «spirituality» and «belief».
However, as writers in this group tend to suggest,
that type of argument overlooks the fact that characterizations of the «essence» of Christian faith are themselves deeply shaped by the social and cultural locations of the people who make them.
That is why the battle ground for
these types of arguments find themselves again and again at the school house.
Don't you think his ideologies may have been more influenced by modern ideas (of the time) like eugenics and purity of the race through genetic selection;
the types of arguments that Christians made a point of opposing?
I do not know if I am right to infer
this type of argument from momoya when she proposes alternate theories about the origin of the universe, or that by extension she would simply suggest that understanding the origin of ever more complex bodies is even more daunting and uncertain, so why pretend we know?
Many of the objections put forward by pro-life agencies in Britain against recent euthanasia Bills gave precedence to the «thin end of the wedge»
type of argument, often pointing to Holland as a worst case example.
I am so sick of writing to
this type of argument.
We've heard
these types of arguments before from Erica Jong and countless mothers before her.
This is
a type of argument that is very easy to get across to the electorate, and it appeals to people in an emotional and quite basic way.