Sentences with phrase «war on coal»

But making war on coal won't destroy jobs.

Craig Richardson 2016-12-11T17:07:15 +00:00 August 17th, 2016 AG Collusion, Common Interest Agreement, Energy, Inquisition, Media Coverage, RICO, Silencing Dissenters, War on Coal

And, obviously, if you were to wage war on coal, you wouldn't need to shut down existing coal - fired facilities at random.

The stakes are high, particularly in view of the Obama EPA's war on coal mining, coal - fired power plants, businesses and industries that require reliable, affordable electricity — and families, communities and entire states whose jobs, health and welfare will suffer under this anti-fossil fuel agenda.

With Donald Trump officially putting an end to the so - called war on coal, states whose economies were hampered by clean air and emissions regulations are finally free to return to the days of rugged, fossil fuel — dependent industry.

So from the start it seems safe to concede that coal is under attack, but it isn't clear that it is an Obama War on Coal that the industry should be most worried about.

But should it be left at that or should Obama and the EPA really gear up a serious war on coal since that is already what many feel is already happening?

«At the same time, so many of our West Virginia legislators have been so locked onto the friends of coal and the «EPA war on coal» rhetoric that it is going to be interesting to see if they can backpedal enough to actually vote for a [state implementation plan].»

The moral of the story here is that if you were able to completely ignore political considerations, the case would be very strong for an aggressive and robust war on coal even if you don't care a whit about renewable energy.

EPA's latest climate alarm - premised war on coal assault calls for states to cut CO2 emissions by 30 % from 2005 levels by 2030 despite satellite - recorded flat mean global temperatures over the past 18 years and counting.

Read More War on coal?

«Our economy can't take the President's ideological War on Coal that will increase the squeeze on middle - class families and struggling miners,» McConnell said.

Another case for a sensible war on coal is this new analysis by Synapse Energy Economics of the much - lauded NRDC plan that proposed a state - by - state approach to setting limits on carbon pollution.

Exports from the Pacific Northwest are an ongoing battleground in the environmental war on coal.

showed a video in which several coal - mining families told their stories of what they suffered when the Obama administration's war on coal destroyed their jobs.

Mann has become a strong proponent of emission controls on carbon dioxide, which fits in very nicely with the ongoing War on Coal conducted by the EPA and the White House — and with the editorial policies of the New York Times — coal being the most prolific source of CO2.

Pushed along by Margret Thatcher war on the coal miner union and giving huge amount of money to «study of problem».

Since she declared war on the coal companies, she's been assaulted, harassed and threatened (a few years ago, she was arrested for battery after shoving a six - foot - tall strip miner who pushed her at community meeting).

«The real war on coal is not being waged by the Obama Administration.

Without serious action, the administration's accelerating wars on coal, guns, the Constitution, state sovereignty, the economy, jobs, and more will continue to wreak real havoc on Americans and the world.

Only one HELE plant has been built in the United States, which went on line before the current war on coal.

Opponents of the alleged war on coal often assert that environmental regulations harm the economically disadvantaged communities where coal production occurs.

What she calls «claims» from those expressing concerns with the President's plan — that regulating carbon will increase energy prices, hurt the economy, destroy jobs, and wage war on coal — more accurately reflect the facts.

The latest battleground for U.S. President Barack Obama's so - called war on coal isn't even in the lower forty - eight states.

In a room normally used for dissecting cadavers, McConnell convenes a meeting highlighting what he says is the Obama administration's «war on coal.»

«Here's the president's message: The war on coal is over,» Pruitt said.

While it is still uncertain just how much coal - energy prices are expected to rise, Rep. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor has called Obama's initiative a «war on coal,» which he says will cost jobs and hurt businesses.

As Murray committed his company to the care of his Lord, he also aired his differences with President Obama, saying that the President's policies amounted to a «war on coal» that necessitated the layoffs of 150 mine workers, to be announced the following day.

Industry advocates often blame the Obama administration's «war on coal,» specifically two signature policies to reduce fossil fuels» carbon emissions — the Clean Power Plan, which never went into effect before the Trump administration moved to eliminate it altogether, and the Paris Climate Agreement, from which the United States has withdrawn.

Posted by Jeff Rubin on September 8th, 2014 under SmallerWorldTags: British Columbia, Coal industry, keystone xl, Obama, Port Metro Vancouver, Surrey Fraser Dock, War on Coal • 2 Comments

Isn't that what the Obama Administration — despite the mixed messages of its war on coal — is after in the first place?

In the US, President Obama has declared a war on coal that's taking direct aim at his country's largest polluters.

Posted by Jeff Rubin on June 11th, 2014 under SmallerWorldTags: Barack Obama, climate change, Environment, Stephen Harper, War on Coal • 1 Comment

The market's war on coal will continue.

In his first State of the Union address, President Donald Trump flicked at a lie about the US coal industry that he began telling early on the campaign trail: that there was a «war on coal,» that coal's jobs will return, that regulations by the Obama administration are responsible for its ills, and that the measures he has taken in office can reverse its fortunes.

According to one advisor of the President, «Politically, the White House is hesitant to say they're having a war on coal.

On the other hand, a war on coal is exactly what's needed.»

After denying any war on coal during the election, now the administration is engaged in one — and this time, unlike the President's war in Afghanistan, with what seems a genuine commitment.

«There's a role for all types of energy, and the war on coal in particular is not good for America.

«My administration is putting an end to the war on coal,» President Donald Trump said March 28, before he signed an executive order that lifted the ban on coal leases on federal land.

Greens blast «war on coal» rhetoric Meanwhile, environmental advocates with the Sierra Club's West Virginia Chapter interpreted the law differently than both the power companies and DEP.

That follows Trump's campaign promises to shrink the agency, which he describes as the spear tip of former President Obama's «war on coal.»

During a visit yesterday to the Harvey mine in Sycamore, Pa., U.S. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt declared that «the war on coal is done.»

«The «war on coal» is from gas, not from any regulation.

Republicans have derided the plan as part of Obama's «war on coal,» and the U.S. Supreme Court has put a hold on the regulations pending the resolution of a legal challenge.

«The war on coal is real,» Zinke said, in response to a question by Senator John Barrasso (R — WY).