Court reversed trial court judgment in favor of plaintiffs, holding that defendants could not be held liable for conspiring to interfere with contractual relations because they were a party to the contract. (romalaw.com)
Reversed trial court judgment in favor of a defendant where court improperly relied on the doctrine of frustration of purpose. (rc.com)
For me this is still a bit of a head scratcher: the engineering is highly sophisticated but the coverage is so spotty as to make it of small use in many cases; certainly someone in Ontario, for example, is unlikely to get much joy from it, given the absence of trial court judgments. (slaw.ca)