It
talks about this legal research course on using books, but then undermines the focus by having primarily negative comments from students who have taken the course.
In this post, I want to share a little of what I learned while teaching a keen group of first - year law
students about legal research, writing and advocacy.
It got me thinking about something I've noticed working in legal information: lawyers don't mean the same thing when they talk
about legal research as librarians do.
Most lawyers learned
about legal research from law school professors, and most of those professors learned from Bob Berring, the granddaddy of legal research.
Slaw features in a list of nine sites where readers can find
more about legal research, putting us in the same company as LLRX, Access to Justice, the Great Library, and LibraryCo.
When teaching students or
lawyers about legal research on the Internet, I usually try to also explain the concept of the «deep» or «invisible» web — the large number of webpages that are not indexed by major search engines.
My day - one poll of the students generally suggests some feel
uncertainty about their legal research and writing skills as they prepare to enter the profession, and they take the course almost as «remedial legal research and writing,» to borrow the words of a colleague.
I mostly
tweet about legal research or legal news so I do #legalnews #lawnews #legalresearch #lawresearch but that takes up a lot of room so then I don't have as much room for the actual tweet.
As Tom Bruce said, «We tend to think
about legal research taking place in multibillion - dollar cases, but often it's a dry cleaner trying to figure out how to stock chemicals.»
This seems to be an underlying idea in some of the comments that have come up from Michael Line's post
about the legal research training tools being developed in B.C. earlier this week.
There are two or more generations involved in this problematic scenario: First the Gen Y's; they may not fully appreciate what a library can do for them; and the Baby Boomers, who have forgotten what they knew
about legal research best practices and to some extent have been lulled into believing everything is free on the Internet.
However, as legal sources have become digitized and migrated online, it is now impossible to
talk about legal research from a purely bibliographic perspective.
I plan to blog my way through this experience as a way of reflecting upon and retaining what I'm learning —
about legal research, writing and drafting, oral and written advocacy and what thinking like a lawyer means in an increasingly dynamic legal profession.
As I listened to Lincoln explain his reasoning, I couldn't help but think
about legal research.
It's
about legal research.
Our library orientation session starts with an associate talking
about legal research and writing memos, including some of the most common pitfalls.
I doubt Steven Spielberg thought anyone watching Lincoln would think
about legal research, but that's what happened to me.
Sandy Gallant - Jones: And today, we are talking
about legal research, one of your favorite classes, right Chris?
It has been so much fun talking with you both
about legal research and about the benefits of the Library of Congress.
For more than 20 years, Carole Levitt has been thinking
about legal research — how it works, how it might be better — and teaching others how to use the internet effectively in the practice of law.
Since this is after all a site
about legal research, let me report that it does not appear that any Canadian court has taken judicial notice of Timbits, although the item is mentioned in R. v. Chan, 2005 ABQB 615 (CanLII).