Sentences with phrase «aggregate contributions»

The announcement from the state board came following two recent court decisions concerning aggregate contribution limits.

The board's announcement came after recent court rulings concerning aggregate contribution limits.

The decimation of aggregate contribution limits only exacerbates the problem.

In early April, the U.S. Supreme Court declared federal aggregate contribution limits unconstitutional in McCutcheon v. FEC.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that limits on aggregate contributions by individuals to candidates and political parties violates the First Amendment.

First there is the annual aggregate contribution limit of $ 54,000 (2017).

(v) who makes aggregate contributions of at least $ 1,000,000 (to multiple Accounts given the Maximum Contribution Limit per Account is currently $ 500,000 per Designated Beneficiary), in which case the Class A Units will be subject to a CDSC of 1.00 % if they are redeemed within 6 months of purchase to satisfy a withdrawal.

The Court determined that an individual's First Amendment right to participate in the political process by supporting candidates of his / her choice outweighed the government's anticorruption interest in establishing aggregate contribution limits and so reversed the trial court.

Of course, every measure eventually demands a countermeasure, and political professionals have long used techniques from «bundling» donations from networks of large donors to creating formal Political Action Committees to aggregate contributions from people sharing a particular set of interests or legislative goals.

2014 04 30 Legal Memo McCutcheon NY State Aggregate Contribution Limit Statute is Likely Unconstitutional -LRB-... by Nick Reisman

While not saying whether he supports closing the loopholes, Lanza said that «if you buy into the notion that aggregate contributions insert undue influence into the system — if you buy that — then we should get rid of all of them.»

Albany Times - Union: Public Financing Reform More Urgent Without Aggregate Contribution Limits

Judge Crotty indicated that although he was obliged to follow the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in McCutcheon v. FEC, which recently invalidated federal aggregate contribution limits, he disagreed with the court's analysis and lamented that regular citizens «are too often drowned out by the few who have great resources.»

Note: Totals are based on aggregating contributions that candidates and parties reported to the state Board of Elections.

The annual aggregate contribution limit for an ABLE account is $ 14,000.

The trial court rejected the Challenger's lawsuit, determining that government's interest in avoiding corruption by establishing aggregate contribution limits outweighed the Challenger's interest in making various contributions.

The Court did not find Buckley's discussion of aggregate contribution limits to be controlling.

LLCs are also subject to the $ 150,000 aggregate contribution limit for individuals, rather than the $ 5,000 corporate limit per year.

In an editorial on Monday, the Buffalo News criticized the New York State Board of Election's decision to not enforce the state's $ 150,000 aggregate contribution limit, saying it sends a clear message that the system is «broken.»

Under the bill, the LLC contributions would be restricted to the same $ 5,000 aggregate contribution limit that current law imposes on corporations.

REBNY also takes full advantage of New York's LLC loophole — which allows each LLC controlled by a single corporation to be treated as an individual subject to a $ 150,000 aggregate contribution limit.

In conjunction with the U.S. Supreme Court decision to strike down aggregate contribution limits, the lack of real reform in the New York State budget empowers the 1 percent, wrote Katrina vanden Heuvel in the Washington Post.

Commissioners at the New York State Board of Elections decided last week that the board will no longer enforce the state's $ 150,000 aggregate contribution limit.

Soon thereafter, a judgment by a federal district court nullified New York's aggregate contribution limit of $ 150,000 as applied to independent expenditure groups, such as super PACs.

The recent Board of Elections decision nullifies the aggregate contribution cap regarding donations to all candidates, parties, and political action committees, in addition to independent expenditure groups.

Yesterday, the Albany Times - Union criticized the Board of Elections» decision to not enforce the state's aggregate contribution limit, saying it would allow a single wealthy donor to «pour millions of dollars into an election like this fall's, when every state office will be up for grabs.»

If the Supreme Court now strikes down aggregate contribution limits, it will further privilege wealthy donors in the political process and further undermine working people's confidence that government is serving the public interest.»

Using the methodology set forth in Dichev (2007), the authors use the funds» external cash flows (that is, the aggregate contributions and distributions) and the reported returns of each portfolio of mutual funds to calculate the internal rate of return.

Additionally, because the rules for the annual - addition amounts apply separately to each plan, the contributions to the retirement plan you adopt for your business can be up to $ 51,000, making your aggregate contribution limit $ 102,000, plus an additional $ 5,500 if you reach age 50 by year - end 2013.

We are fortunate to have many colleagues in the field of adding up climate mitigation proposals to assess their sufficiency, aggregate their contributions, and see what more is needed.

First enacted in the 1970s in the wake of the Watergate scandal, these aggregate contribution limits work to prevent corruption and the appearance of corruption, and were upheld along with individual campaign contribution limits as constitutional in 1976.

This is subject to the aggregate contribution in the year not exceeding 10 % of the death benefit.

The Supreme Court of the United States has considered a challenge to the aggregate contributions under federal law that individuals may make to campaigns and committees.

The case removes the aggregate contribution limits to federal committees and also calls into question the constitutionality of any state - law aggregate contribution limits.

The Court declared the aggregate contribution limits unconstitutional because these limits forced individuals to limit, or reduce the amount of support for, candidates of their choosing.

The Supreme Court of the United States reversed the trial court and declared the aggregate contribution limits unconstitutional.

Therefore, the court ruled that the aggregate contribution limits infringed the Challenger's First Amendment right to support candidates of his choosing and the government had failed to offer a compelling interest to justify this infringement, and so the Court declared the aggregate contribution limits unconstitutional.