Sentences with phrase «alarmist climate»
The phrase "alarmist climate" refers to a situation where people are excessively concerned about or constantly worried about the issues related to climate change. It suggests that there is a tendency to exaggerate or overemphasize the potential negative impacts of climate change, potentially causing unnecessary fear or panic. Full definition
Over the past decade alarmist climate scientists — including the top figures in the field — have been deliberately misleading the public on many climate issues.
paulmacrae.com
In fact, most feedbacks in our physical world are negative, but alarmist climate scientists tend to assume very high positive feedbacks.
The Swedish professor tells the BAZ that he became a skeptic of alarmist climate science early on because «the [UN] IPCC always depicted the facts on the subject falsely» and «grossly exaggerated the risks of sea level rise» and that the IPCC «excessively relied on shaky computer models instead of field research.»
«A Devastating Reassessment of Alarmist Climate Science Two Examples of the Enormous Real Costs of «Green» Power»
He noted, «there are still many policy challenges ahead, including alarmist climate change policies, the stifling of public charter schools, the spend - and - tax habit of state and local officials, weak private property rights protections, and local government intrusion disguised as «smart growth» policies.»
The much more appropriate simultaneous equation approach used in this new report is notable by its apparent absence (to my knowledge) in alarmist climate «science» despite the contribution it could and must make if climate science is to have any validity.
Pontificate is correct, my English sometimes gets a little muddled like alarmist climate science — my apologies.
«Billions are being wasted on climate change policies which will have no meaningful impact on the climate and the science supporting alarmist climate theories is also crumbling.
Given the preponderance of alarmist climate models that predicted significant warming, this fact alone should be reason enough for regulators and scientists to reassess their conclusions.
The last paragraph's especially important: «When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer - reviewed scientific journal, show a «huge discrepancy» between alarmist climate models and real - world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials would be wise to take notice.
«Trying to Perpetuate Alarmist Climate «Science», «Townhall, October 19, 2017.
«Another Fundamental Problem with Alarmist Climate Science How Climate Cultists in the Democratic Party Have Lost Touch with Reality and the Needs of the Less Wealthy»
Plibersek takes the most alarmist interpretation of the most alarmist climate change scenarios out there.
I am grateful when people take the time to comment and, yes, criticize, but I also think this writer oversells the certainty we should feel about alarmist climate science and its conclusions.
At least, this is what alarmist climate scientists like Hansen want the public to believe.
But one psychological diagnosis fits alarmist climate science like a glove: groupthink.
One might even say alarmist climate scientists have developed a culture of deception, a culture that is very clear in the «Climategate» emails.
In recent years, important hypotheses of alarmist climate science have been shown to be scientifically invalid despite alarmists» claims that their hypotheses represent a «consensus» among climate scientists.
There will be dueling and inconclusive testimony from the two sides of the science and there will be Steyn knocking the snot out of the alarmist climate science establishment.
Brulle inferred that this uncertainty stems from a conspiracy that prevents the public from sharing his alarmist climate views.
The alarmist climate media is at it again.
Alarmist climate science is a textbook example of groupthink in action.
And so, while most scientists change the hypotheses to fit the data, alarmist climate scientists prefer to change the data to fit the anthropogenic warming hypothesis.
The necessary changes in hypotheses proposed here are devastating to alarmist climate «science.»
And so, over the decade, alarmist climate scientists tried to fool the public by stonewalling («it's the warmest decade on record,» which doesn't mean the decade was warming), denying the facts («the allegation that annual global mean temperatures stopped increasing during the past decade has no basis in reality»), or outright lying («the world is warming even more quickly than we had thought»).