He will likely teach about the epidemic of the lack of love and service in our communities rather than the lack
of biblical literacy.
Pretty much everything I have said above
about biblical literacy can also be said about gaining a biblical worldview.
I think what we should be asking people about is
not biblical literacy or biblical trivia, but biblical love, or better yet, love literacy.
Biblical literacy leads to a Biblical worldview, however I can see where people might differ in their understanding of what this worldview should be.
When it comes to information, what is needed is not so
much biblical literacy, as it is biblical understanding.
It is not uncommon to hear the pastors who decry the lack of
biblical literacy in the church today to also preach against LGBTQ people.
If you hire a pastor who has the spiritual gifts of mercy, or service, his sermons will probably not be full of Bible knowledge and theology facts, nor will he place a heavy emphasis
on biblical literacy.
Personally, I don't see the lack of
biblical literacy as a bad thing; I see it as a clear sign that the Spirit is moving the churches.
I would say many pastoral sermons in our day and age probably do
hinder biblical literacy because they really aren't sermons, but talks and speeches.
Twenty - first -
century biblical literacy and biblical spirituality thus necessarily involve a measure of historical - critical deprogramming, for both Church and world have mistakenly assumed that a dissecting approach to the Bible is the only intellectually mature approach.
Classrooms of children can take part in an interactive encounter within Noah's Ark, face down lions with Daniel, or take part in a host of other games that
enhance biblical literacy.
So I am thankful that studies and reports are showing that people are more and more biblically illiterate, because I think it finally raises the question of whether that should have ever been the goal in the first place, and whether or not
biblical literacy ever really even «worked» in helping people live biblically.
I wouldn't even consider that now, of course, (as it would be an unintended mockery) but I still
think Biblical literacy is good for literary purposes in general and critical for anyone who claims to base their lives on the book.
Scott Hahn has founded a study centre specifcally to «
promote biblical literacy for Catholic lay people and biblical fuency for Catholic scholars and clergy» — a fruit of Pius XII's Divino Afante Spiritu and Vatican II's Dei Verbum.
This sort of gets back to the question of what biblical illiteracy actually is, but when I listen to the pastors and professors who are decrying the lack of
biblical literacy in the church, I am often amazed to hear what comes out of their very own mouths, and it makes me wonder how biblically literate they themselves are.
Another problem is that when people calk
for biblical literacy and then see pain and problems in the lives of others, they either think that a Bible verse will help the other person, OR that the other person wouldn't be having these problems if they had just known the Bible better.
Notice that those who decry the lack
of biblical literacy in the church often say that the solution to this problem is to come listen to their sermons, buy their books, and attend their schools.
What often happens in churches and groups that place a heavy emphasis
on biblical literacy is that the goal in the Christian life seems to be little more than the accumulation of Bible facts and theological trivia.
God is Redeeming Scripture Bible & Theology Topics: Bible Study, Bible teaching, biblical illiteracy,
biblical literacy, bibliology, church, Preaching
Biblical literacy is a big problem in most mainline churches.
Our age, now sadly bereft of
biblical literacy, is left to ponder these once startling images.
I almost didn't put this item in the list because I am about as uneasy with the concept of a «biblical worldview» as I am with the concept of «
biblical literacy.»
The problem is not a lack of
biblical literacy; the problem is a lack of biblical living and loving, and to be honest, you don't need to know much about the Bible in order to live and love like Jesus.
Have you ever noticed that those who talk most about the lack of
biblical literacy in the church today are those who get paid to raise the level of biblical literacy in the church today?
Have you ever taken one of
these Biblical literacy tests?
I think sometimes this is what happens when certain pastors and teachers say that Christians must increase the level of
their biblical literacy.
Biblical literacy isn't just knowing a bunch of bible verses or getting 100 on a bible quiz.
Biblical literacy should no longer be defined as «how much you know about the Bible,» but should be defined instead by «How much you love like Jesus, who reveals to us that God is love.»
The need for
biblical literacy is championed by those who have the time and training to study it, and by those whose income requires people being dependent upon them for learning the Bible.
The quest for
biblical literacy is a quest with no end, and the problem with the Bible is that it has enough ideas to occupy our minds for eternity, which means that if we keep from stepping out to love and serve others until we feel like we know enough, we will never feel like we know enough.
If you believe in
Biblical literacy and the infallibility of the Bible's writers, then those passages you quote and many others in the N.T. are indeed hard to understand, even after two thousand years of examination and discussion — at least without developing some fantastic theology that goes completely against God and nature.
But if we strive for
biblical literacy, we end up with neither biblical living nor biblical literacy.