The phrase
"consistency reliability" means that something or someone is dependable and trustable because they consistently perform in the same way or produce the same results over time.
Full definition
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the following: 1) the construct validity of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (Steger et al., 2006), Greek Version using different explorative and confirmative factorial analysis approaches like Bifactor EFA, ICM - CFA, Bifactor CFA and ESEM; 2) the measurement invariance of MLQ across gender; 3) the internal
consistency reliability of the MLQ; and 4) the convergent and discriminant validity of the MLQ with measures of well - being and mental distress.
Findings from Study 4, were consistent with the three previous studies, reported in the current research, and indicated adequate item level variance and strong internal
consistency reliability for the SRLTAS.
Subscales derived from factor analysis include economic burden, family / social impact, personal strain, and mastery; however, only the Total scale score (internal
consistency reliability =.88; Stein & Riessman, 1980) was used in the current study.
The authors of the instrument report high internal
consistencies reliability with Cronbach alphas between.84 and.93 and test - retest reliabilities of.85 or better (Beavers & Hampson, 2000; Franklin et al., 2004).
Internal
consistency reliability ranged from.74 to.93; evidence for construct validity with other measures of family and parental functioning has also been demonstrated (Brannan & Heflinger, 1997).
The CHS has demonstrated acceptable construct and convergent validity and internal
consistency reliability (Varni et al., 1989, 1991; Zuckerman et al., 1986.
Internal
consistency reliability was determined by calculation of the Cronbach
In their study of 47 versions of ISMI Boyd et al. showed good psychometric properties including reliability, test re-test reliability, internal
consistency reliability and also a number of validity studies [6].
Internal
consistency reliability was acceptable with a Cronbach
Internal
consistency reliability was satisfactory with Cronbach's alphas ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 for all subscales.
The reliability includes internal
consistency reliability and test - retest reliability.
In other quantitative work4, there was found only mixed support for the hypothesised five factor model of the SDQ, but the acceptability, internal
consistency reliability and convergent validity of the instrument were all satisfactory suggesting the SDQ is a promising tool for assessing the social and emotional wellbeing of urban Aboriginal children in NSW.
Reliability coefficients indicate that all measures demonstrated adequate internal
consistency reliability.
In correction for attenuation, the «true» correlation is calculated using the internal
consistency reliabilities of the two measures and the correlation found between them.
The five items on the scale have consistently demonstrated sound internal
consistency reliability and strong item to factor correlations (e.g., Pintrich et al., 1993).
In previous multicultural validation studies the GSES has demonstrated adequate internal
consistency reliability (α = 0.86 - 0.94)(Luszczynska et al., 2005a; Luszczynska et al., 2005b).
Internal
consistency reliability in the present study was α = 0.89.
To demonstrate how outcomes assessment can assist in describing clients receiving rehabilitation in occupational health rehabilitation clinics and to describe the preliminary assessment of internal
consistency reliability and construct validity of the FOTO Industrial Outcomes Tool.
The internal
consistency reliability (alpha) of the About My Teen scales is the following: Scale 1 — Parent Observation of Child Behavior -.4180 Scale 2 — Parent Attitudes and Beliefs -.6535 Scale 3 — Parent Behaviors -.7553
The scale demonstrated good internal
consistency reliability (α =.84), similar to the internal consistency reliability in the original development of the scale (α =.80; McCarthy et al. 2000).
The internal
consistency reliability (alpha) of the About My Child scales is the following: Scale 1 - Parent Observation of Child Behavior -.7884 Scale 2 - Parent Attitudes and Beliefs -.8549 Scale 3 — Parent Behaviors -.8346
The scale comprised 8 items to which participants respond on a scale of one to nine and has been shown to have excellent internal
consistency reliability and discriminant and convergent validity in a study conducted with university students from America and Korea (Triandis & Gelfand, 1998).
In study 3, we tested the internal
consistency reliability, split - half reliability and criterion - related validity of the three subscales.
Analysis of the VADPRS appears under five headings: (a) internal
consistency reliability, (b) item analysis, (c) factor structure, (d) concurrent validity, and (e) comorbid scales for factor structure, reliability, and validity.
TUSO - Q scores exhibited satisfactory evidence of internal
consistency reliability and construct validity.