Sentences with phrase «crash prevention system»

The small SUV's small overlap front rating has improved from poor to good, and its new optional front crash prevention system rates superior.

It also needs an available front crash prevention system earning an advanced or superior rating.

The 48 winners of the «plus» award have a superior - or advanced - rated front crash prevention system with automatic braking capabilities.

Early forward crash prevention systems were limited to low speeds and limited in the type of impacts they could prevent.

Under the three - tier rating scheme, models with optional or standard rear crash prevention systems are rated superior, advanced or basic.

The 2016 Pilot offers an available frontal crash prevention system that earns a top rating of superior.

Front crash prevention systems use various types of sensors, such as cameras, radar or laser, to detect when the vehicle is getting too close to one in front of it.

It is possible that some of the observed benefit for front crash prevention systems in avoiding rear - end collisions is actually a result of adaptive cruise control.

The new available front crash prevention system helped the Pilot earn a superior rating.

Its optional front crash prevention system does earn a superior rating, but all available headlights earn a poor rating.

Its standard front crash prevention system improved from an advanced to a superior rating.

Here is a brief explanation of several key innovative crash prevention systems which are currently being employed on this year's model.

Their optional front crash prevention systems only recently became available for testing.

The 2017 winner's circle includes 21 models with a standard front crash prevention system with automatic braking capabilities.

The 2018 model's optional front crash prevention system earns a superior rating.

Front crash prevention systems use cameras, radar, or other sensors to monitor a truck's path and alert the driver of a potential collision with a vehicle or object.

A combination of the luxury car's technologies and available front crash prevention system helped it earn the prestigious rating, putting it among the best in its class.

The redesigned car's optional front crash prevention system earns an advanced rating.

It coupled a score of acceptable or better in the small front overlap test with at least the OPTION of an automated frontal crash prevention system on that model as the minimum bar to receive TSP +.

ARLINGTON, Va. — The Subaru Impreza, previously a Top Safety Pick award winner, moves up to 2014 Top Safety Pick + with the addition of a superior - rated front crash prevention system as an option on the 2015 model.

The requirements for front crash prevention systems also became tighter for 2016, as TSP + winners must earn either an «Advanced» or a «Superior» rating.

EyeSight, which uses Subaru - developed stereo camera technology, is the highest - rated front crash prevention system by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).

All the models listed below have optional front crash prevention systems except for the Scion iA, the Acura RLX, the Mercedes - Benz E-Class, and all Volvo models, which have standard systems.

IIHS assigns models with available front crash prevention systems basic, advanced or superior ratings based on system type and performance in track tests.

In total, HLDI has studied nine different front crash prevention systems from five manufacturers.

In IIHS track tests at 12 mph and 25 mph, a Sedona equipped with the new front crash prevention system avoided collisions.

An advanced - rated front crash prevention system comes standard on the GLE - Class.

Analysts examined the point of impact for S60s and XC60s with City Safety and for comparable vehicles without a low - speed front crash prevention system repaired under PDL coverage.

This means that the vehicle scored a GOOD rating in all five of the IIHS crash tests, and that its front crash prevention system scored a SUPERIOR rating.

In general, current front crash prevention systems fall into two categories: forward collision warning and front crash mitigation or prevention with autobrake.

Thirty - six midsize models either don't offer a front crash prevention system at all, or they have a system that doesn't meet NHTSA or IIHS criteria.

For this year, IIHS has tightened its standards by requiring a «Good» or better rating in all five of the crashworthiness categories to earn a «Top Safety Pick» and making an available front crash prevention system mandatory for all awards.

Due to the company's commitment to safety, the 2016 Toyota Avalon, RAV4, Camry and Prius V each received good ratings in five of the IIHS» crash - worthiness tests, and earned a superior or advanced rating for their available front crash prevention systems complete with automatic braking.

Vehicles that meet the crashworthiness criteria but have only a basic - rated front crash prevention system qualify for the second - tier award, Top Safety Pick.

Shake ups have already taken place with the introduction of the small overlap front crash test, and, most recently, front crash prevention systems criteria.

Beginning in 2013 the IIHS began assessing the effectiveness of front crash prevention systems including forward collision warning and collision mitigation braking systems.

The Edge doesn't qualify for the «plus» award because it doesn't have a front crash prevention system equipped with automatic braking.

«Current driver assistance and crash prevention systems need to be improved to address a bigger variety of crashes and crash conditions.»

Good crashworthiness and improved availability of front crash prevention systems resulted in top ratings in latest round of Euro NCAP's tests ahead of the 2015 Frankfurt Motor Show.

Ninety percent of respondents said they would want the front crash prevention system again in their next vehicle.

IIHS began rating front crash prevention systems earlier this year after research by its affiliate, the Highway Loss Data Institute, showed that forward collision warning and automatic braking systems are reducing crashes.

IIHS also recently completed a study designed to see if forward crash prevention systems with automatic emergency braking was proving to be effective in the real world.

Large trucks could get a major safety upgrade if the U.S. mandates front crash prevention systems on big rigs.

The Institute rates models with optional or standard front crash prevention systems as superior, advanced or basic depending on whether they offer autonomous braking, or autobrake, and, if so, how effective it is in tests at 12 and 25 mph.

The car's available front crash prevention system also received a score of «superior,» which can be attributed to its Top Safety Pick + rating.

According to the IIHS, the 2018 Volvo XC60 aced the crashworthiness tests and its standard front crash prevention system improved from an advanced to a superior rating.

The 2015 Outback offers the latest version of the EyeSight driver - assist system, the highest - rated front crash prevention system by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).