Sentences with phrase «employee in question»

Employee in question took a phone case from off the wall with the intention of replacing plaintiff's case.
The state employee in question is Matthew McDermott, age 51, who works as an IT manager for the Department of Citrus.
The Nintendo employee in question was apparently known in certain activist circles and had appeared, in her capacity as an employee of Nintendo, in podcasts and the like on various gaming news sites.
Also, while it is only effective within the relevant governmental body, the Attorney General of the federal government (in cases involving the federal government's interpretation) and the AG of a state with respect to state employees can make internally binding determinations in the form of an opinion letter that a statute is unconstitutional, which are effective until a court with jurisdiction over employees in question rules otherwise.
Let's talk about the mechanism by which justice was meted out to the employee in question.
If the answer was no — that the employee in question had no idea they were about to be let go — then my manager simply wasn't doing their job.
They didn't have to be made directly to the employee in question to have a negative effect, either.
We don't know whether the employee in question was merely having a bad day.
You've also taken a great second step, in separating the two employees in question, although you need to be careful on how you do this.
Since the employees in question were IT workers, they were concerned that this assistance would include consulting on technology - related issues.
McDonald's has argued that it was not responsible and should not be involved in the case because the employees in question worked at franchise locations.
For example, Reed says that if the employee in question recently «made complaints of racial or gender discrimination, yet the behavior or performance problem does exist, it's a good idea to talk to an attorney about how you might approach that person.»
CBS News spokeswoman Christa Robinson said in a statement that Licht's actions were «within the scope of CBS policy at the time» and that the «employee in question was satisfied with the result.»
Licht's actions were «within the scope of CBS policy at the time» and that the «employee in question was satisfied with the result,» CBS News spokesperson Christa Robinson told the paper, adding that CBS revised its policy in 2016 to require supervisors to «promptly report» harassment complaints to the human resources department or a compliance officer.
a stern reprimand, maybe suspended w / o pay for a week (at most) or something like that would be enough for the employee in question.
Dr. Haldar told a SUNY RF audit team member that the employee in question «performed the out of state work for SoloPower while simultaneously performing his responsibilities in support» of the Photovoltaic Manufacturing Consortium (PVMC), a jointly controlled, $ 62.5 million nonprofit partnership between SUNY RF and SEMATECH (itself a nonprofit consortium) backed by the U.S. Department of Energy.
Dr. Haldar told a SUNY RF audit team member that the employee in question «performed the out of state work for SoloPower while simultaneously performing his responsibilities in support» of the
DioGuardi steadfastly denied the charges and his campaign also filed its own complaint with the State Board of Elections that argued, contrary to his opponent's commercial, that the employees in question put funds in a separate «People For DioGuardi» campaign account as required by state law.
Officials of the University of Northern Colorado have offered to retrain this year's graduates from its college of education who fail to perform satisfactorily on the job, at no cost to the schools or the employees in question.
Brian Hall the general manager of Windows Live referred was the employee in question, who possibly slipped up big time.
Brian Hall the general manager of Windows Live referred was the employee in question, who possibly slipped up big -LSB-...]
While employment and privacy laws preclude us from discussing the circumstances surrounding the departure of any individual no longer with the company, we can confirm that the employee in question worked for us a total of 90 days, whereas Darksiders II was more than 2 1/2 years in development.
In past cases the ban has been upheld on the basis that it was necessary for the employee in question to carry out their job effectively and safely or another legitimate business aim.
your last paragraph, if I were the employee in question I think I would have assumed that an NDA was assumed / implied / normal from day 1, whether or not it was formally documented, and that my wages and benefits were sufficient consideration for that NDA (again, from day 1).
If an employer wants to issue notice of dismissal on grounds of suspicion, the circumstances need to be sufficiently suspicious such that it is almost certain the employee in question committed the relevant offence.
After meeting with the employee in question about what they found, the employer terminated the employee's employment for cause.
In order to reach the conclusion that such private employees are amenable to suit under Bivens, the majority found that the employees in question were acting under color of federal law in the course of transferring the inmate plaintiff to an offsite medical facility.
The employee in question, Marilyne Dionne, was a pregnant contract supply teacher.
The employee in question had been employed as a Sales Agent with Allstate for more than 23 years.
If the employee in question, or indeed other employees, have people who work at their employer's customers as connections, does that take away from any otherwise confidential aspect of the employer's customer list?
Misunderstanding or not, the counsellor in this case made a grave error, and both the counsellor and the HR department at AHS should have thought twice before using the employee's personal health information, especially given that the employee in question was employed by the service providing him with the counselling.
It is something that will have been taken for granted by many law firms — either consciously or otherwise — but it's also something that may itself come under pressure: the employees in question are comfortably - off, middle class people, who are accustomed to certain comfort zones.
As such, the case is an important one for employers to remember in the sense that, even if it is ultimately found that the employee in question was not discriminated against, the employer can be penalized for failing to properly investigate.
The employee in question, Ms. Doyle, had worked for the employer, Zochem Inc. (a manufacturer of zinc -LSB-...]
Background The employee in question was a Senior Customer Service Agent who was 45 years old and had been with the -LSB-...]
The Tribunal analyzed the different stages involved in the commercialization of the products in order to settle the issue, and it concluded that the employees in question were indeed engaged in production tasks, thus violating section 109.1 of the Labour Code.
Since the bargaining unit covered the production employees, if the tasks performed by the employees in question qualified as R&D, as Delastek claimed, the Tribunal would have to conclude that they were working legally.
The employee in question was an industrial safety specialist who had access to nuclear facilities and information that is relevant to national security.
The employee in question had worked for BC Tel for almost 17 years, and had gone on sick leave.
Even the smallest of employment decisions can affect the employee in question and become potential retaliation claims.
Because of this, we understand the difficulties these situations can create, particularly when the employee in question remains on the job after a complaint is lodged or a lawsuit is filed.
Second, the employee in question was a high - income earner which, given that extraordinary damages are often kept somewhat proportionate to ordinary damages, may play into the equation.
There's an interesting parallel there, in that the employee in question certainly had a legal right to marry outside of her faith (just as a gay TWU student has a legal right to marry a way that is inconsistent with TWU's faith), but the court held that the religious school was equally entitled to exclude her from their community.
The employees in question all worked in the detailing shop at West Coast Mazda in Pitt Meadows, BC.
The employee in question was allegedly trying to sell sensitive information on Samsung's fabrication process for 14nm and 10nm - based processors, which does suggest that the information is clearly very important and it is thus no wonder that Samsung is suing the employee.
Per an NSC statement, the employees in question secretly installed mining software on the ministry's servers and computers, reducing network speeds and slowing down the ministry's tech operations.
Your letter should motivate a new employer to offer the employee in question a job.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z