Contemporary liberal philosophy is unable to respond to theological challenges because it can not account
for religious people who are actually religious.
The easiest way to find a
mate for religious people is to go on niche dating website and feel there «at home» among friendly users of the same faith.
Using Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s I Have a Dream message as an example, he says that sermons are not
just for religious people who already agree with the preacher.
The reason that Atheists are putting up signs is because we really do feel
sorry for the religious people... Only my fellow Atheists would understand where I am coming from with that statement..
«It's important to start with the existing language of the law that applies to everybody and not create a special category just
for religious people because that may single them out and make them subject to religious discrimination.
Huh, at last proof (proof
for religious people of course, since its blatantly obvious to normal people) Proof that god CAN make mistakes.
He notes that while
for some religious people religious observance is restricted to the attendance at services, for the Orthodox Jewish couple «every aspect of their lives, every aspect of their being, of who and what they are, is governed by a body of what the outsider might characterise as purely religious law».
Fun
fact for religious people: Scientists have spent more time trying to understand your religious book than you have spent trying to understand their scientific theories.
So I guess what I'm trying to say is this: there is a right
way for religious people to help those around them come to know and follow God, should they so desire, but yelling at them about fire and brimstone is not really acceptable or in good taste.
The case law arising out of the free exercise clause has long involved broadening such narrow definitions, which has resulted in requirements for accommodations of various
sorts for religious people in the public square.
Smalling and Schuklenk exhibit
contempt for religious people, whom they regard as dimwitted literalists nursing «arbitrary and random» moral beliefs.
But prayer is far more cash
effective for religious people, and it allows their megachurch to get the money — it takes a lot of money to keep Joel Osteens hair looking like that, what with the price of oil being what it is.
Tell me why it considered taboo to challenge religious beliefs when it's considered perfectly
fine for religious people to challenge any subject they see fit?
that's an interesting question Sabio... but i know most atheists, vocal ones anyway, say that just being human demands kindness, etc... so the same would hold
true for religious people i suppose... how many christians?
I believe the judge saw a religious person and an atheist and
ruled for the religious person because not having any religion is worse than mugging someone in his mind.
As
for you religious people out there, you don't have to pray for those of us who don't believe what you do, some of us are ok people anyhow.
Among the many compelling
reasons for religious people to engage science is the human tendency to base our worldviews on the prevailing physics of the day.
The major difference between athiests and religious people is that athiests do nt go out actively
searching for religious people, and then hassle them to try and make then stop believing.
Is it really
fair for any religious person, no matter how sane and reasonable they seem to be, to preach love and tolerance when they also still hold an incredible intolerance towards atheism?
Those who do not want to believe in evolution do not have to, but it is
inconsistent for religious persons to believe that any aspect of the human body whatsoever is perfect, even if it was designed without any evolution at work.
Im a Christian too, and I would like to let you know that you can visit any dating website, because most of them have a
section for religious people.
As a film, it's a bore, and probably only of
interest for religious people who like so - called scary movies but aren't allowed to see one involving anything that derives its malevolent force from the occult, or anything with an R rating.