It shows a definite increase in the emission of carbon in the last 200 years of a 1000 year time span
from fossil fuel burning by humans in the northern hemisphere.
The climate system already has some heating yet to be realized; it has not yet caught up with the effects
of fossil fuel burning of past decades.
By adopting these technologies, states can also reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions significantly,
as fossil fuels burned for transportation represent the largest share of the region's GHG emissions.
Even though global energy demand is the same in either case, effectively we will need to produce less energy because less is wasted through
inefficient fossil fuel burning.
If there is a second source, and that source is the cause of rising CO2 levels, then there must also be an explanation where the CO2 emissions of
fossil fuel burning go.
Since we are trying to
discourage fossil fuel burning and excessive air travel, it makes sense to transition slowly from these uses towards battery technology.
For perspective, about 10 billion tons of carbon is released annually to the atmosphere from
combined fossil fuel burning and land use changes.
Can carbon capture and storage be scaled up to the size necessary to capture a significant fraction of the world's greenhouse gas emissions
from fossil fuel burning?
For example, a tax
on fossil fuel burned would spur investment in cleaner energy technologies, such as renewables or nuclear power.
Is it possible to separate the effect
of fossil fuel burning from a release of oceanic carbon on atmospheric carbon 13?
Our activities, such
as fossil fuel burning and deforestation, are pushing the cycle out of its natural balance, adding more and more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.
Many lines of evidence, including simple accounting, demonstrate beyond a shadow of a doubt that the increase in atmospheric CO2 is due to
human fossil fuel burning.
The world is warming due to the release of CO2
by fossil fuel burning This will change the climate unless we reduce CO2 emissions.
Add in the aerosol reduction which would result from
stopping fossil fuel burning, and we're awfully close to the 2C «grabbing a tree branch as you go off the cliff» guardrail.
On one dimension are the scope and extent of our use of the planet's resources and ecosystems — for instance, the area of land used for agriculture, industry, and housing, or the amount of
fossil fuels burned for energy — and on the other dimension are the intensity and efficiency of that exploitation.
That means the atmosphere in 2100 would hold an extra 4 1/2 years» worth of carbon dioxide emissions from
fossil fuel burning at current rates,...
Because oxygen is critical to many forms of life and geochemical processes, numerous models and indirect proxies for the oxygen content in the atmosphere have been developed over the years, but there was no consensus on whether oxygen concentrations were rising, falling or flat during the past million years (and
before fossil fuel burning).
Aerosol forcings are substantially a result of fossil fuel burning [1], [76], but the net aerosol forcing is a sensitive function of various aerosol sources [76].
Phrases with «fossil fuel burning»