That's problem
with human writers dreaming up applications for godly powers — they think in human terms — emotionally effective for humans of course, but logically absurd.
So much so that the
early human writers / story tellers of the biblical stories just about got the right order in genesis.
The authors used their skills
as human writers, choosing and selecting, synthesising and explaining, always within their communities and in the context of the kerygma, the preaching of the Gospel of salvation.
Demand Media, an exemplary case, commissions content
from human writers (who are willing to meet very low standards at high speeds for very little money) on the basis of an algorithm that determines ad revenue over the lifetime of any given article.
A little farther, there are amphibians... then reptiles... Fast forward millions of years to one
human writer sitting in front of her blank computer screen.
Briefly, it teaches that unlike other Holy Books of other religions, the Bible is the truly inspired Word of God, that somehow or another, along
with human writers, God is the author of the Bible.
The human writers of scripture certainly though so, and they also thought God felt this way too, but does it «make sense?»
@independentlyowned: Just wondering if anyone who «believes» in theories put forth by the science textbook «bibles» personally has irrefutible evidence that
the human writers of these books have not committed fraud or misrepresentation within their scientific evidence and research?
No change in contract (dispensationalism), no unified Bible (but an anthology of
human writers).
The alien AI finds
the human writer entertaining and even murmurs something to itself as it flits away.
Dana Gore is a health and fitness professional, author, wellness coach, and freelance writer, fascinated with consciousness and the human