It's an impartial and independent research platform for incentivized polling of experts
on important scientific issues that are relevant to policymakers.
The three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — reveal how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most
important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
But Voinnet, Baulcombe writes, also showed «hard work and [the] ability to focus on
the important scientific issues to the exclusion of everything else, including the real world.»
Linda Geddes's sobering report about the reliability of forensic evidence highlights
an important scientific issue: the need to establish error...
I submit that your real mission is not to provide more data for a (admittedly fascinating) scientific study of pattern recognition, it's to disseminate accurate information on one of the world's most
important scientific issues.