Sentences with phrase «issue with the film»

And that brings us to the biggest issue with this film: the pacing.

While some teachers took issue with that film, this particular video's message is simple and straightforward.

The main issue with the film is simply the poor screenplay, which has its own identity issues.

My only issue with the film is that it felt a little too much like the Swedish films.

While I had a few minor issues with the film, I thought it was, and still is, the best video game - to - film adaptation ever released.

Which brings up my major issue with the film, the endless plot twists and double crosses.

I'll also admit, after 1 viewing, I have some small issues with the film.

My only real issues with the film came towards the middle half and the very end.

I have been experiencing some technical issues with filming so here's to hoping I'll get that all sorted out and can use my new camera soon.

I think the first issue with the film are the visuals.

The only other content issue with the film is the depiction of a character suddenly being hit by a vehicle.

Though I have many issues with this film, the most prominent is the identity of the film.

And herein lies my central issue with the film.

This is an ongoing issue with the film industry in recent years.

Despite my personal issues with the film, the special features that appear here are well worth the time of those seriously interested in the events of 9/11.

One of my biggest issues with the film is that it wasn't nearly as funny as it should have been.

This is ultimately my main issue with the film.

I had some minor issues with the film, and I thought that the film though good, wasn't as good as I'd thought it is.

Perhaps the greatest issue with this film will be the question of its appropriateness for some of the youngest admirers of the novel.

The other hilarious issue with this film, apart from the pantomime like costumes on the players, is the track or arena.

The biggest issue with this film for me was not that it was not as hard hitting as his other work but that it went off on some unneeded tangents.

(Indeed, there are some other casting issues with the film, between a blink - and - you'll - miss - it, but ultimately distracting, cameo from Berg, and the co-starring turn by Jerry «Turtle from Entourage» Ferrara as a communications officer.)

Now, of course, there is «45 Years» and while I have a few issues with the film as a whole — the storyline at times plays more like a riff on an old «Alfred Hitchcock Returns» episode than a serious drama — I have none with Rampling's work as a woman who is stunned to discover that after 45 years of marriage, her seemingly loving husband is still a mystery to her.

Violence with bows and arrows, knives, axes and swords are the primary issue with this film.

My only significant issue with the film is that I found James Franco to be distracting and miscast.

While some may take issue with the film visually or vocally, there is much more to enjoy than lament here.

As I try to take an unbiased approach from a viewer not having read the books and interested in the structure of the film, I do notice some glairing issues with the film that honestly affect all book to film adaptations in one form or another.

Apparently, there were framing issues with the film's previous DVD releases — as if a cropped fullscreen transfer had further been cropped — but I detected nothing of the sort here.

The great issue with the film is that we've seen all that it has to offer in countless other...

As with other reviews, my main issue with the film was the shallow take on the moral dilemma of the story with the timely spaceship mishap allowing a neat and tidy wrap - up.

I have only two major issues with the film but they big enough to really annoyed me.

While neither the book nor the film show Wiseau in a flattering light, the enigmatic actor has approved of The Disaster Artist, although Franco revealed in an interview that Wiseau had one small issue with the film:

In fact, we have to say that our main (only) real issue with the film was that we wanted more: Jodorowsky's presence is like a gently hallucinogenic and instantly addicting drug, and 90 minutes of it just isn't enough.

The biggest issue with the film is that everything happens under the surface and it makes it difficult to sit through a film that has really unique elements but such slow pacing.

The only issue with the film is that it's overlong, resulting in periodic disengagement — especially for younger viewers.

We have a unique opportunity to discuss these issues with film - maker Josh Fox, law professor and former Gubernatorial candidate Zephyr Teachout, along with special guest actor James Cromwell.

The first three or four paragraphs in which he identifies all of the issues with the film is exactly where I'm at with it.

Some may take issue with the film's portrayal of Harding (a widely hated villain) as a victim of circumstance, but she's certainly an intriguing individual to watch and the film never sugarcoats the less - than - savory aspects of her life.

I take issue with the film's curiously high number of «When Animals Attack» scenarios, too, with Tripp running afoul of everything from chipmunks to dolphins.

That weakness is not an issue with the film itself, but rather audience expectations.

I will say that I had some issues with the film, I found it to be somewhat inconsistent.

Exactly, which is an issue with the film business of course.

That's part of the issue with this film, too many subjects covered.

I do have issues with the film and many would probably disagree with me but I found it to be a tad slow and too long.

My issues with the film all revolve around the character of Evelyn and how things are handled with the character.

If I had any issue with the film it was simply that things work out a little too easily at times.

Because I can't figure out how to express my issues with the film without mentioning one major point although it doesn't spoil the action of the final act, just how Soloway chooses to get there.

This highlights the main issue with the film — it's so heavy - handed, and it's often tough to place whether it's trying to be original or aiming for satire and, therefore, winds up feeling like a failed attempt at both.