Remy is a different
kind of striker from Costa and Drogba, given that he's pacey and a great finisher.
Ibra might be
ageless kind of striker, but his wages demand will be (it said could rich 500K per week) absolutely ridiculous.
To do that we need a
Rewandowski kind of striker, someone who can score dead ball goals, someone who can score from nothing, someone who can take - on defenders single - handedly when we are canter - attacking.
We need to understand that for our system to work we need a van
persie kind of striker - a person who is as adept at scoring goals as in assisting, or may be I should say Sanchez type of striker.
To do that we need a
lewandowski kind of striker, someone who can score dead ball goals, someone who can score from nothing, someone who can take - on defenders single - handedly when we are canter - attacking.
What Giroud is offering the team is his strength and teamwork abillity but sometimes we need a different
kind of striker as Girouds play can become predictable.
let's be honest here... the article has some points... he is right in d sense Giroud helps the teams... he is
d kind of striker that helps d midfield to score goals n shine....
Depending on what
kind of striker plays up top, Arsenal can be fluid, sharp, quick and unpredictable or we can be slow, nervous, lethargic and predictable.
Only two
kinds of striker worth signing (1) a young guy who isn't the finished product signed on potential or (2) someone who is clearly better than Giroud.
Like seriously Giroud pissed me off most times I see him in Arsenal Jersey, I don't know
what kind of a striker that is afraid to hold the ball and face defenders.
Whether he suits our style or not, we now have
different kinds of strikers, if we wan na play counter like we did against Bayern... vardy will be good... we can play him with Giroud too... It is a risk, but to completely condemn it is not a good idea, we are not Barcelona or Madrid!
That's
the kind of striker we need: strength, pace and aggression.
«Arsenal need to be in the market for
these kinds of strikers this month.
He» a nice guy and stuff, but not
the kind of striker that can lead is like the Biblical Moses.
In any case, I think
the kind of striker we need is a big man someone like Lewy, Falcao or Cavani.
I can only say that whatever happens, we need to
kinds of strikers for different situations.
He may be a little bit older than
the kind of striker Man United are looking for, but he can serve as a mentor for Anthony Martial and score plenty of goals as the French youngster learns.
Yes he has helped us secure wins but he is not
the kind of striker we can count on to lead us to a major trophy.
Spot on KickAssFan; We lack
that kind of striker to change the mood of the game.
We will draw against Spuds because they're very disciplined in defence and our team doesn't have
the kind of striker it would take to dismantle them.
But he is
a kind of striker we should be crying for.
Everybody is weighing in on what Arsenal needs to do to win the league next season and there is so much emphasis on
the kind of striker that we need to buy.
That kind of striker may not be available but maybe Wenger can work his magic and find a talented goalscoring winger that has everything it takes to be moulded into a CF, like Draxler.
I like giroud but we need someone with more dynamism even if his goal ratio is similar to giroud's own because
these kind of strikers strike fear into the minds of the opponents defenders.
you want to ruin me falcao transfer, i did nt have
this kind of striker since henry, remove that shit you want someone to enter the race, real madrid maybe... david you are ripping me apart... now remove that, and after i sign him you will get the exclusive... david» ok, la proof»..
Giroud, like every sensible person knows, is not really
the kind of striker needed at Arsenal, perhaps second choice.
With
the kind of striker and players Fab had and have what do you expect??
The Belgian international can also fit any tactical system as he can effectively run the channels, hold the ball up and he also has the ability to be a typical «fox in the box»
kind of striker.
Give a decent pass to lacazette and he scores 80 % of the time, that's
the kind of striker he has always been.
That exactly
the kind of striker Chelsea have needed at times this season, especially with Alvaro Morata struggling for consistent form since joining last summer.
This could be just
the kind of striker they need.
Injury prone player & not really
the kind of striker that will transfigure our forward line.
I hope it went well for us because watching the legend (King Henry) goal on YouTube with the assist of Dennis Berkamp, and Robert Pires really call for changes in our striking position when compare with
the kind of strikers we have presently.
RVP is a different
kind of striker.