Sentences with phrase «liability statute»

In Massachusetts, a third party such as a landlord, is not liable under the Massachusetts strict liability statute governing dogs.

In Colorado, this statute is the Colorado Premises Liability statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-115.

Conservatives have also favored Bush's pro-business tort reform during his governorship, which resulted in Florida becoming one of only a handful of states that have overturned long - established liability statutes, which freed businesses from more extensive damages in the case of negligence.

Many of the patients affected by NSF / NSD have filed gadolinium lawsuits or joined class action gadolinium lawsuits claiming that the manufacturers of gadolinium - based contrast agents were negligent or violated product liability and / or pharmaceutical liability statutes.

California holds to a strict liability statute when it comes to dog attacks.

Minnesota has a strict liability statute for injuries caused by dogs.This statute applies if the dog bites, chases or attacks the victim causing injury.

New Jersey's strict liability statute specifically addresses recovering compensation for dog bite injuries.

Given that Ohio's joint and several liability statute allows only a partial recovery, in most cases you could end up with little or nothing if you have not gotten the correct defendants into the case.

In Colorado, this statute is the Colorado Premise Liability statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-115.

To support the lawsuit, the Hathcock family filed four separate expert reports to satisfy the medical liability statute's requirements, including one report discussing the medical cause of Hathcock's death.

California has what is known as a «strict liability statute» when it comes to dog attacks.

Giving broad consideration to liability statutes, generally the responsible party is only responsible for the actual cash value of the property that suffered a loss.

South Carolina has a «strict liability statute» when it comes to dog bite cases.

Under California's strict liability statute, dog owners can be held liable for the damages their pets cause.

This is a strict liability statute, which renders the dog owner liable for all of the damages resulting from the dog bite, without having to prove fault or negligence by the dog owner.

Most states have a premises liability statute that provides the duty of care owed by the landowner to others on their property.

Most states have a premises liability statute, which provides the duty of care owed by a landowner.

In 2004, in Vigil v. Franklin, the Colorado Supreme Court held that the premise liability statute was the sole remedy available against a landowner for injuries sustained on land.

Giving broad consideration to liability statutes, generally the responsible party is only responsible for the actual cash value of the property that suffered a loss.