Sentences with phrase «majority opinion»
The phrase "majority opinion" refers to the viewpoint or decision that is held by the greater number of people or members within a group or organization. It is a prevailing belief or stance that is supported by more individuals rather than being the opinion of a minority. Full definition
It should be noted, however, that both examples are not necessarily majority opinions of the citizens.
politics.stackexchange.com
Of the seven majority opinions by Grant that were not unanimous, only two contained an additional opinion actually explaining the disagreement.
By contrast, when majority opinion does affect the outcome or the odds, contrary opinion can be put to use.
The same majority opinion also refers the tax as too small to actually compel compliance and is therefore just a small optional tax for those who choose to forgo health insurance.
If majority opinion in the legislature favors some restrictions upon abortion, and there is no specific language in the Constitution on the subject, then «pro-choice» forces have to invoke something very much like a natural law duty to get their way.
In September 2002, I published online a letter from a Mississippi - based reader of my appellate Web log who thought odd the practice of one or more of your colleagues on the Supreme Court of Mississippi to dissent, in whole or in part, without opinion from majority opinions of your court.
The document adds: «Similarly, pupils from religious or other belief backgrounds should also feel included, and their religious beliefs treated with respect and understanding, even or especially where such beliefs may not align with majority opinion.
Justice Kennedy's majority opinion said that there was no principled way to distinguish between media corporations and other corporations and that the dissent's theory would allow Congress to suppress political speech in newspapers, on television news programs, in books and on blogs.
This explains fraudulent hockey sticks, ferocious concealing of data and algorithms, and various other shenanigans on which majority opinion rests.
My point is that millions of poeple have read the bible and there is no clear majority opinion as to what it says on several major points.
Despite that effort, majority opinion seems more in line with the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), a science - education template that Branch called «the gold standard.»
Here is how the Kimbrough decision's majority opinion authored by Justice Ginsburg gets started:
In the controversial 2008 Supreme Court opinion establishing a basic right to own a weapon, Justice Antonin Scalia's majority opinion made clear that the Second Amendment doesn't grant people «a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.»
Justice Antonin Scalia's majority opinion stated the rule was not «narrowly tailored» to preserve judicial impartiality because it focused on issues instead of on particular litigants.
«Federal Appellate Judge Dissents Without Reading Majority Opinion ``: At «The Volokh Conspiracy,» Eugene Volokh has this interesting post about a Second Circuit decision issued yesterday that I previously noted at this link.
The so - called majority opinions expressed herein on this topic are a reflection, I am afraid, of sequestered group - thinking, not on the part of all commentators, but on most.
We can recognize right and wrong, and we recognize that it is altogether independent of whatever may happen to be majority opinion at any given time or place.
This includes the right to hold beliefs that run against majority opinion, such as those of minority religions, cults and even discriminatory groups like white supremacists.
It is the first paragraph in Gorsuch's first majority opinion since joining the Supreme Court, Henson v. Santander.
In one majority opinion last year, Gorsuch cited the Fourth Amendment in overturning a man's conviction of possessing and sending child pornography.
In deciding Kennedy v. Louisiana, holding that the Constitution bars the death penalty for child rape, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy's 5 - 4 majority opinion relied heavily on a survey of state and federal law.
I have written before that Justice Thomas rarely assigns majority opinions, given seniority and the Court's ideological breakdown.
Beyond the specifics of the two rulings, I find especially noteworthy the fact that the «swing» voter helping to make up the two - judge majority opinions in these cases are district judges from within the Sixth Circuit sitting by designation.
However, the court's majority opinion fueled public perception that medical evidence does not conclusively establish that alcoholism is a disease — even though the medical community and the entire health profession at large overwhelmingly agree that it is.
In the absence of legislation on assisted dying, we have to establish the right to a doctor - assisted death through the courts but we also hope that Paul's case will help to stimulate public debate on this issue, and convince Parliament to listen to the massive majority opinion in this country and legalise assisted dying.»
They imbued majority opinion with nearly religious significance, yet maintained institutions that depended on individual experimentation, innovation, and expression.
But the Supreme Court majority opinion, written by Justice Antonin Scalia, said the EPA acted unlawfully when it failed to consider how much the regulation would cost the power industry before deciding to craft the rule.
Then Gorsuch issued an opinion concurring with his own majority opinion (a nifty move I may emulate sometime), calling out the «elephant in the room,» namely, the Chevron doctrine.
In the 1978 case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, Justice Lewis Powell's majority opinion supported affirmative action for its contribution to a diverse student body and the «robust exchange of ideas.»
In considering whether Arizona was meeting the requirements of the EEOA, Justice Samuel Alito's majority opinion faulted the district court and the Ninth Circuit for focusing on the «narrow question» of funding, and ignoring whether managerial and instructional reforms had brought the state into compliance.
It is especially gratifying that Justice Breyer's majority opinion focused on the considerable harm that the Second Circuit's opinion would have caused libraries.»
A Small Business Majority opinion poll released a month earlier found that the majority of small employers — about 60 percent — believe climate change and extreme weather events are an urgent problem that can disrupt the economy and harm businesses.
The Courant points out that a justice who wrote the first majority opinion resigned and was replaced by a justice who became part of the majority overturning the conviction.
Of the 7 SCC judges, there were 2 different majority opinions, and a dissent by 3 judges.
In his November 2014 majority opinion upholding Indiana's Right to Work law, Justice Brent Dickson bluntly noted:
691, 60 U.S. 393, 577 - 578 (1857) dissenting opinion (majority opinion subsequently overruled and superseded by constitutional amendment).
Likewise, Justice Scalia talks about «the crime the state actually seeks to punish» in his Blakely majority opinion.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court's majority opinion unwittingly implicates issue preservation concerns that might seem to require a prevailing party on appeal in the Court of Appeals -LSB-...]