Sentences with phrase «natural gas generation»
Changes in the fuel mix play out in different ways across the country, reflecting regional variation in the economics of increases in natural gas generation and renewable capacity.
eia.gov
But if storage gets cheap enough, this equation may flip and storage could threaten the economics of natural gas generation.
However, if project pipelines evolve to include more natural gas generation projects, care will be needed to ensure that this «bridge» fuel does not lock out renewables.
Coal and natural gas generation shares over the past decade have been responsive to changes in relative fuel prices.
In contrast, during the first half of 2011, coal made up about 46 % of total generation while natural gas generation grew to 17 % of total generation.
Coal and natural gas generation fell by a combined 133 million kWh, while renewable generation expanded by 78 million kWh (Figure 1).
The move would protect those plants from some of the competition from natural gas generation and, to a lesser extent, from renewables.
These changes in anticipated natural gas generation occur in spite of new projections that point to lower natural gas prices.
Natural gas generation produces about a third of the nation's electricity today and provides many of the same benefits as storage since these power plants are easy to switch on and off.
Natural gas generation meets all three objectives, providing a generation solution that is clean, reliable and affordable.
This means natural gas generation can replace traditional coal and nuclear power that are no longer economic, as well as support intermittent renewable power.
Natural gas generation keeps the power on and grid stable when the sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow.
The two estimates are mostly aligned on all generation estimates with the exception of small differences in wind and solar and large differences in natural gas generation estimates.
Two - thirds of coal - generated electricity will be replaced by renewables — primarily wind power — while natural gas generation will continue to provide firm base - load reliability.
«The rapidly dropping price of wind and solar, combined with natural gas generation rather than coal, lead to solid economics, high reliability, lots of renewables, reduced emissions, and local control,» said Weaver.
«The decline in emissions during this period reflects shifts in the regional fuel mix,» the report states, «with increasing natural gas generation offsetting decreases in coal and oil - fired generation.»
Adjusted earnings for 2016 also exclude the gains on the sale of natural gas generation facilities.»
In the UK, carbon pricing — charging those who emit carbon dioxide — has become much stronger in recent years, making it more profitable for power companies to use natural gas generation rather than coal.
Annual natural gas generation surpassed coal generation for the last six months of 2015, and came within 1 percent of annual coal generation for the first time in U.S. history.
Meanwhile, natural gas generation prices are increasing as carbon costs are included; nuclear generation prices are forecast to increase in Ontario to recover refurbishment costs; and new hydro mega-projects are seeing costs climb.
As renewables like wind and solar approach 30 per cent grid penetration, operators will need to increase the flexibility of their grids using natural gas generation, manage up to 2...
The chart below shows how this inverse relationship can work: when monthly hydropower generation dips under 10 - year average levels, monthly natural gas generation often rises above its 10 - year average in response.
According to EIA, utilities will increase natural gas generation first, with reneawbles growth taking over to make up for retirements later in the compliance period.
The authors found that RPS policies supported 200,000 jobs in renewable energy - related businesses, and saved consumers $ 1.2 bn in reduced electricity prices and somewhere between $ 1.3 bn and $ 3.7 bn in reduced natural gas prices, because renewable sources displaced natural gas generation.
Market - driven natural gas generation growth is projected to continue, and emissions per megawatt of total electricity generation are projected to decline.
In 2016, coal - fired and nuclear power each contributed a bit over a third of the electricity, followed by natural gas generation, which provided a little more than a quarter of the load.
But the construction of this plant in a region that has traditionally relied on, what used to be, less expensive diesel and natural gas generation sources could well be a sign of things to come.
This risk factor pushes the «levelized» or all - in price of nuclear power from new units to 8.4 cents per kilowatt - hour, the MIT study concludes, versus 6.2 cents for coal - fired plants and 6.5 cents for natural gas generation (if gas is priced at $ 7 per million British thermal units, or roughly 1,000 cubic feet of flowing gas).
Canada, on the other hand, has yet to regulate new natural gas generation.
By 2020, conventional coal plants must be phased out because of carbon cap restrictions, and in their place, natural gas generation soars, providing half of all electric power.
Similarly, the big solar industry is adding natural gas generation to its massive remote industrial solar power plants in CA.
The authors reject the idea that one expensive measure — the practice of «firming» wind energy by balancing it with natural gas generation at every hour — is necessary in light of other low - cost options.
With power industry restructuring in the 1990s, the construction of new power plants was dominated by independent power producers who favored natural gas generation due to short construction times and low capital costs.
Pennsylvania coal and natural gas generation additions were constructed in two fairly distinct waves.
Achieving that would include following the ISO - NE natural gas generation plan, deploying more community microgrids, and increasing infrastructure hardening.
Natural gas generation during the winter of 2011/2012 (November through February, the latest electric power data available) was up 69 billion kilowatthours compared to the prior winter, despite the generally low demand for electricity.
The recent decline in the generation share of coal, and the concurrent rise in the share of natural gas, was mainly a market - driven response to lower natural gas prices that have made natural gas generation more economically attractive.
Natural gas generation climbed far above the five - year range, especially starting in January when spot natural gas prices began to fall.
In April 2012, the last time monthly natural gas generation came close to surpassing coal - fired generation, spot prices for natural gas were near $ 2 per million Btu ($ / MMBtu) on a monthly average, before returning to about $ 3.50 / MMBtu in the last months of 2012.
Regulation of carbon emissions from the power sector under provisions of the Clean Air Act depends almost entirely on the Environmental Protection Agency's determination that cheap natural gas generation is the «best available» alternative to coal power plants.
Boosting natural gas generation is one option EPA has recommended as states seek ways to meet the carbon reduction targets imposed on them by the plan.
Sufficient to make it cost competitive against natural gas generation in the USA at a gas price of $ 6 - $ 7 / MMBtu.
That could make wind competitive on price with natural gas generation even in the Southeast, though flexible gas plants or other resources would still be necessary to integrate the capacity.
The large - scale deployment and use of renewables and natural gas generation represents a significant change in the power flow, both in direction and magnitude, for the bulk power system (BPS) and could be «a significant planning and operational challenge,» concludes NERC's report, «Potential Reliability Impacts of EPA's Proposed Clean Power Plan, Phase 1.»