In addition, the practice
of ability grouping for guided reading within the regular education classroom further supports this aspect of instruction.
Though hardly the final word on such a hot - button issue, the new study helps clarify the academic
effects of ability grouping and acceleration.
The solution is to introduce minimal health standards, applicable to all, and a certain
amount of ability grouping (without regard to race) to insure reasonable efficiency of instruction.
So how do teachers make
sense of ability grouping and instructional differentiation in the era of data - driven decision making?
Although there is some variation depending on methods and research design, conclusions on the
impact of ability grouping are relatively consistent.
The bulk of evidence over the last century «suggests that academic acceleration and most
forms of ability grouping like cross-grade subject grouping and special grouping for gifted students can greatly improve K - 12 students» academic achievement.»
The
resurgence of ability grouping comes as New York City grapples with the state of its gifted and talented programs — a form of tracking in some public schools in which certain students, selected through testing, take accelerated classes together.
Members of the National Forum have struggled with the many
nuances of ability grouping and have come to consensus on a statement of policy.
Mike Petrilli talks with Education Next about the challenges of teaching high - achieving and low - achieving kids in the same classroom, and about one school in Montgomery County, Maryland, which is using a
blend of ability grouping and differentiated instruction with great success.
According to data collected by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), the
frequency of ability grouping's use in fourth grade reading instruction rose about two and a half times, from 28 percent in 1998 to 71 percent in 2009.
To give but one of several examples, the authors offer a nuanced
discussion of ability grouping in schools that highlights the potential tensions between the value of improving the performance of the weakest students and the consequences of increasing the gap between them and the most gifted, since the latter are likely to reap the greater gains from ability grouping.
Zooming in on Teacher Data Use Practices: Understanding the
Logics of Ability Grouping and Differentiated Instruction By: Vicki Park and Amanda Datnow
«The government's inability to confront the harmful practice
of ability grouping coupled with its desire to further expand selective schools will exacerbate the challenges highlighted in this report and further entrench educational disadvantage.
The results of this study raise, once again, the question as to why schools both in Australia and the United States so often reserve
programs of ability grouping for students in the upper years of primary school, and why teachers are so reluctant to allow young gifted children to grade advance.
It is heartening to note that as the
use of ability grouping is increasing a new generation of researchers is bringing sophisticated statistical techniques (and open minds) to bear on questions involving both ability grouping and tracking.
Despite a lack of faith in the results of primary assessments, 64 per cent of secondary teachers said their school created ability sets by using KS2 data, raising further questions about the
efficacy of ability groupings.
But educators of the gifted value the
benefits of ability grouping for advanced learners...» Carol Ann Tomlinson, Gifted Learners and the Middle School: Problem or Promise?
It's heartening to note that as the use
of ability grouping is increasing a new generation of researchers is bringing sophisticated statistical techniques (and open minds) to bear on questions involving both ability grouping and tracking.