One proposed regulation in the Every Student Succeed Act (ESSA) is for states to analyze the
performance of student subgroups separately in order to show how states are leveling the playing field over time to ensure educational equity.
The new provisions are an acknowledgment that multilingual America must do more to meet the language
needs of a student subgroup — comprising 10 percent of school children nationwide and 22 percent, about 1.4 million students, in California — that has trailed in graduation rates, college admission and other key academic indicators.
While most schools must account for
achievement of student subgroups numbering 100 or more, CORE is disaggregating and reporting academic data on school subgroups with as few as 20 students — a move that means the performance of an additional 150,000 students who otherwise wouldn't have been counted is included.
The participation rate of 90 is also required among a
number of student subgroups, such as minorities, students whose primary language is not English and children in the foster care system.
First, it would all but eliminate school - level information about the
learning of student subgroups, as testing only a single grade in each school often results in sample sizes for groups such as English learners or blacks that are too small to yield reliable information for the school as a whole.
According to the piece, states will now be accountable for: • Tracking the performance of public and charter schools • Track data that allows for
comparison of student subgroups • Promote increased academic performance and graduation rates
Under NCLB, an entire district can be subject to immediate state - level intervention if one or
more of its student subgroups fail to meet AYP for two consecutive years.
CAP used the 2012 - 13 school - level proficiency rates from the U.S. Department of Education to compare the proficiency rates
of student subgroups with the overall performance of their school.
Hispanic English language learners showed the greatest learning
gains of any student subgroup, with 72 additional days of learning in math and 79 in reading.
My upcoming posts will delve into the details behind the movements up and down the scale for individual schools, and then what is underlying that in
terms of student subgroups and correlation with OUSD programs.
Board of Education President David M. Foster said that persistent differences in the performance
of student subgroups underscore the importance of the SOL program in detecting achievement gaps and in identifying low - performing schools in need of state interventions and resources.
By doing so, this intersection allows for the creation of a more holistic and well - rounded learning environment that can positively impact student learning, foster greater student engagement, and ultimately lead to interventions that address the unique
needs of student subgroups.
In Texas, and under NCLB nationwide, holding schools accountable for the performance
of every student subgroup has proven to be a mixed blessing.
As with schools, that determination must be based not just on overall student achievement, but also on the performance
of student subgroups, broken down by categories such as race and ethnicity.
According to NJDOE data, last spring, nine schools in seven New Jersey districts had overall schoolwide NJ ASK participation rates below 95 percent; 175 schools in 104 districts had participation rates below 95 percent for at least one
of the student subgroups (e.g., special needs, Limited English Proficient, economically disadvantaged, etc.,).
The super subgroups combined smaller subgroups of low - performing or disadvantaged students, but Ed Week notes that «civil rights advocates argued they allowed states to mask the performance
of some student subgroups.»
California's Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) has granted schools and districts funding to strategically address the needs of English learners as one
of the student subgroups that have been historically underserved.
He says the new law's flexibility regarding how states decide how to improve the performance
of student subgroups will be «intentional about creating diverse classroom experiences for students» and «more deliberate about presenting students with a diverse range of material.»
The panelists — including Arkansas's Fort Smith Public Schools Superintendent Benny Goodman and the National Center for Learning Disabilities's Laura Kaloi — also advocated for using multiple assessment measures to judge school quality, adding more flexibility for improving low - performing schools, maintaining a focus on holding schools accountable for the performance
of student subgroups, tracking student growth, and ensuring states set high standards.
Despite this increase, EL students in Nevada continue to graduate at one of the lowest rates (42.58 %)
of all student subgroups.
The state contends that the performance
of student subgroups will be indicated on report cards, which will be modified to add a «federal percent of points index,» that includes EL progress towards English proficiency.