Sentences with phrase «pixel per inch»

More pixels per inch means more distinct and readable text, I assume.

The increased pixels per inch count is expected to further go higher.

To explain: both the 4.5 - inch and 5 - inch versions of the Moto G have 720p resolution screens, meaning you get far fewer pixels per inch in the larger model.

They are both 6 - inch with a 300 pixel per inch resolution.

The H2O has higher resolution with about 50 extra pixels per inch so things like images and fine details are a little clearer.

That translates to a massive 4 million pixels or 300 pixels per inch at your disposal.

And if it's clarity you're after, you're in luck: 300 pixels per inch seems to be the new standard among most recent ebook readers.

We'll talk apps, ecosystems, batteries, and just how many pixels per inch is enough.

Many of the latest flagships exceed that, giving you incredible pixel per inch clarity, but 1080p is often enough.

The more pixels per inch, the higher the detail on the screen.

The screen resolution on both the S8 and S8 + are higher than its predecessor and with fewer pixels per inch.

It's still more than 260 pixels per inch on display, meaning everything looks sharp at arm's length, but you will see individual pixels if you hold it close to your face.

At 800 x 480 pixels, the resolution on the Evo 4G is the same as the 3.7 - inch HTC Droid Incredible and Motorola Droid, so you're getting the same amount of pixels per inch in a bigger space.

The Galaxy S7 has a Quad HD super AMOLED 5.1» Touch Screen display, with a 5.1 inch high resolution Quad HD 2560x1440 pixel display with a pin - sharp, 577 pixels per inch density on a hard glass substrate.

The Galaxy S6 and Galaxy Note 4 are neck - and - neck record holders for display performance, effectively tied or alternating between first and second place in almost all categories except screen size for the much larger Galaxy Note 4, and the much higher pixels per inch for the Galaxy S6.

The Pixel should theoretically offer a sharper image than the Nexus 5X thanks to the increase in pixels per inch, though the difference probably won't be hugely noticeable.

At 1136 x 640 pixels, the iPhone SE's screen actually sports the same number of pixels per inch as the 1334 x 750 panel on the iPhone 6s.

The 8.9» display on Kindle Fire HD features an incredible 254 pixels per inch with a resolution of 1920x1200, with pixels that are indistinguishable to the human eye.

In particular, the coarse and heavily pixelated low resolution and low pixels per inch screen made worse with poor anti-aliasing, the very low color depth, the poor color gamut in ambient light, and also the poor viewing angle performance (because watches are not easily positioned for zero degree viewing).

«The Galaxy S7 and Galaxy Note 5 are neck - and - neck record holders for display performance, effectively tied or alternating between first and second place in almost all categories except screen size for the much larger Galaxy Note 5, and the much higher pixels per inch for the Galaxy S7,» Soneira wrote.

Though larger, the DX's screen actually has a lower pixels per inch figure - 150 vs 167 - but the difference is indiscernible to the eye.

Still, that gives the 6.2 - inch display of the Galaxy S8 + some 615 pixels per inch while the 5.8 - inch Galaxy S8 screen bumps that density measure to 657.

What is especially news worthy and significant is that the performance of the OLED display on a flexible plastic substrate for the Galaxy S6 edge + is now essentially the same as on a traditional glass substrate for the Galaxy Note 5, even at 500 + pixels per inch and 2560x1440 resolution.

Oh, and speaking of that display: the iPad Mini's has 25 % fewer pixels per inch compared to its Amazon and Google competitors.

That's just 12 pixels per inch less than the iPad Air 2.

Also, I'd like to point out that a retina iPad mini, meaning a 7.9 inch iPad with the same resolution as the 9.7 inch iPad, would have practically the same pixel per inch rating as the 2013 Nexus 7.

While a 13.3 - inch laptop has about 165 pixels per inch when it is powered by a 1080p display, the same resolution on a 5 - inch phone offers 440ppi.

It offers 16:9 ratio and support 1280 - by - 800 resolution at 216 pixels per inch make the text and images look crisp, clear, bright and good colors.

Small numbers, but 236 pixels per inch means it is incredibly sharp.

It lacks the pop of the iPad mini screen, although it is slightly sharper than Apple's small tablet with 215 pixels per inch against the iPad's 162.

The 7 - inch 1200 x 800 HD backlit IPS display packs a respectable 216 pixels per inch onto the screen.

Other dimensions include 10.1» diagonal with 100 pixels per inch SVGA resolution and 10:1 contrast ration with 4 levels of grayscale.

Do you mean pixels per inch rather than pixels per square inch if it's pixels per square inch it would be like a pixelated crimewatch photo!

The 212 pixels per inch allow texts and images to be viewed in higher detail and clarity, coming out to being 62 percent more pixels than on the prior Kindle Touch.

The 10.1 - inch, 1,280 - by -800-pixel IPS display is disappointingly low - res by today's standards, and the resulting 149 pixels per inch looks choppy, especially with text - heavy websites or apps.

While the Kindle Voyage is the flagship of the range, it's the Kindle Paperwhite which is the retailers best seller and it now packs the same high density display with 300 pixels per inch across its six inches.

In fact, the resolution works out to a sparse 127 pixels per inch.

A 600 pixel square image set to 300PPI will print a 2 inch square image (600 pixels divided by 300 printed pixels per inch).

Screen size: 6 - inch e-paper (diagonal) Resolution: 212 pixels per inch Processor: 1 GHz Wireless: Wi - Fi (3G model also available) Battery: 8 weeks (Wi - Fi off / 30 minutes a day) Storage: 2 GB (over 1,000 books + free Amazon Cloud storage) Dimensions: 6.7 x 4.6 x 0.36 inches Weight: 7.3 ounces

It's thin, light, and the screen jumps up at you in 300 pixels per inch splendor, with a brighter built - in light.

With that said whether you'll personally be able to notice and appreciate the 225.9 pixels per inch comes down to your eyesight.

Japan Display's Full Active LCDs are six inch displays with a resolution of 2,160 x 1,080 and an 18:9 aspect ratio, which doesn't quite match up with Kuo's pixels per inch prediction, but Japan Display could be making custom panels for Apple.

In order to maximize the sub-pixel packing and achieve the highest possible pixels per inch (ppi), that leads to diamond rather than square or stripe shaped Red and Blue sub-pixels.

It's a state - of - the - art OLED panel made by Samsung Display with 458 pixels per inch which Apple coupled with Precision Display Calibration that it developed to get the most out of the panel.

In fact, we really think this is a prime example of how pixel density beyond a point is overrated — we found the display on the M8 to be markedly brighter and better at handling colours than the more pixel per inch endowed HTC One.

Since the screen didn't get any bigger, there is a lot more pixels per inch now — 326 to be exact.

When the screen's just a few inches from your eyeballs, the difference between 500 and 800 - ish pixels per inch will seem like night and day.

SGS4 goes full HD compared to the SGS3's 720p offering and there are more pixels per inch too.