Sentences with phrase «procedural justice»

"Procedural justice" refers to fairness and fairness in how decisions are made or processes are carried out. It means that everyone involved in a situation or procedure is treated fairly and has a chance to be heard and understood. Full definition
A court user's experience of procedural justice in this social or psychological sense can be enhanced by the use of humour.
The theory behind procedural fairness, or procedural justice as it is sometimes called, has developed over a period of more than 25 years.
Attention is given to the background and political context of procedural justice theory.
It found that procedural justice considerations were more important than demographic factors in explaining perceptions of state courts.
The ensuing conversation centers on the effect procedural justice can have on law abiding and law enforcement in a community.
The articles and presentations below highlight how procedural justice can increase adherence to the law.
The enhancement of law enforcement through procedural justice ensures that the community as a whole will become more law abiding.
Some studies find that victims are more satisfied with the criminal justice system when they have received a favorable outcome, while others show that procedural justice elements dominate their concerns.
Mediation may not meet the fairness test in terms of procedural justice, but does it need to?
The present study utilizes survey data collected from a representative sample of 1,204 Australians to show that the effect of procedural justice on victims» willingness to report crime to police is context specific.
Procedural justice requires all parties in a legal matter to be able to state their case, to be heard, and to be treated with the dignity we might expect to be an inherent characteristic of an unbiased judiciary.
Below are publicly - available articles which discuss procedural justice in a variety of psychological and sociological contexts.
Thinking About Judges and Judicial Performance: Perspective of the Public and Court Users David Rottman and Tom Tyler, Onati Socio - Legal Series 4 (5)(2014) This article «describes and critiques existing judicial performance evaluation programs that incorporate procedural justice principles as a dimension for measuring quality through both survey and observational methods.»
Similarly, Jonathan Jackson discusses procedural justice as an important aspect of criminology's definition of legitimate authority in his chapter, On the Dual Motivational Force of Legitimate Authority.
But since John Rawls talks so much about procedural justice, and since no enlightened professor today would dare label John Rawls a pettifogger, I am not embarrassed to raise a procedure question in the conduct of these debates.
Procedural Justice for Law Enforcement Agencies PowerPoint Presentation Laura L. Kunard, Ph.D., University of Illinois, Center for Public Safety and Justice Dr. Kunard's presentation is geared towards offering local law enforcement officers practical tips and examples of procedural fairness principles.
Procedural Justice Concepts in Arlington, Texas PowerPoint Presentation Theron L. Bowman, Ph.D., Police Chief, Arlington Police Department Chief Bowman's outline of procedural fairness applications gives an overview of concrete actions a police department can take to advance law abiding in the community and the standing of the department in the eyes of its employees and the community.
The introduction and application of procedural justice practice has allowed the Antitrust Division to make gains in enforcement and conviction.
Legitimacy and Policing: The Benefits of Self - Regulation Beto Lecture Series Video Presentation Professor Tom Tyler, Yale Law School Professor Tyler argues that a change should be made in the evaluation of police, drawing on the psychology of legitimacy, which is rooted procedural justice.
Having reaped enormous profits from free trade in those areas where they enjoy a distinct comparative advantage, developed countries violate procedural justice whenever they curtail or suppress the liberalization of markets in which they have a comparative disadvantage.
It's basically this preoccupation with procedural justice, which goes with a highly individualistic society (we are all individuals competing; the rules have got to be the same for all of us) that accounts for the revolt against affirmative action.
Procedural justice means the fair enforcement of the rules so that the rules are the same for everybody — impartial enforcement of the rules.
Johnson said procedural justice is mentally fatiguing is because it requires managers to conform to particular fairness rules, such as suppressing personal biases, being consistent over time and across subordinates, and allowing subordinates to voice their concerns.
alone could be seen as an issue of retributive justice, distributive justice, or even procedural justice.
In rejecting the submission he observed, «it would be remarkable if there were a material difference of general approach between Convention law and EU law in relation to the important issue of procedural justice raised in this appeal.»
Mechanisms of Legal Effect: Theories of Procedural Justice Tom Tyler, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (2011) Tom Tyler discusses the impact that procedural fairness can have on the physical and psychological health of employees in large organizations.
What remains relatively unclear, however, is whether procedural justice is more important to victims than other instrumental factors, such as the outcome favorability of their encounters with police.
Victim Willingness to Report Crime to Police: Does Procedural Justice or Outcome Matter Most?
These tips and examples are aimed towards promoting officers» understanding of how following appropriate procedural justice principles can help them in the performance of their law enforcement duties.
Procedural Fairness in Antitrust Investigations Speech Christine A. Varney, Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice Assistant Attorney General Varney's speech provides a detailed look at procedural justice as practiced at the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division.
Have there been any appeals claiming want of fundamental justice or procedural justice based on the abridged or inquisitorial process?
Ability trust is mainly influenced by distributive justice (β = 0.423, t = 15.153) and not by procedural justice (β = 0.236, t = 5.910) or interactive justice (β = 0.107, t = 2.873).
Procedural justice requires that individuals or groups are able to participate, in the right way and to the proper extent, in some decision - making process.
But since John Rawls talks so much about procedural justice, and since no enlightened professor today would dare label....
Its use seeks to find polices which maximizes utility while ignoring questions of distributive justice, ethical obligations based upon duties to prevent harm, human rights violations, procedural justice considerations that would give victims of harms rights to participate in decisions that impose risks, and many other ethical issues.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z