Sentences with phrase «reliability coefficients»

The exception was the scale used to measure growth mindset, which had an internal reliability coefficient of 0.7, somewhat below the commonly used benchmark for acceptable reliability of 0.8.

Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for the 15 items version is.90.

The composite score (reliability coefficient in this study: =.83) is used as a global measurement of working alliance.

Reliability is typically captured using reliability coefficients as well as confidence intervals that help to situate and contextualize VAM estimates and their measurement errors.

A high internal consistency reliability coefficient of.92 was computed for the subject matter pretest.

Interrater reliability coefficients range from.62 to.75 (Assessment of children: Cognitive applications, 2001).

The SESBI - R and ECBI have been shown to have high internal consistency for both Intensity (α = 0.98, α = 0.95) and Problem scales (α = 0.96, α = 0.93).54 Reliability coefficients at 12 - week intervals for SESBI - R and ECBI Intensity (r = 0.94 and r = 0.80) and Problem scales (r = 0.98 and r = 0.85) are also high.54 A reduction in score indicates fewer and / or less problematic disruptive behaviours.

Value of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient on scores of Urdu Passionate Love Scale was found quite high i.e. α =.90 which considered the best (Tezbasaran, 1997).

Split - half reliability coefficient of the PLS is.89 for the part I and.90 for the part II.

The psychometric properties of the revised scale appear adequate as demonstrated by good internal reliability coefficients, high test - retest reliability, and effective discriminatory power.

However, κ reliability coefficients of blinded psychology interns who observed the assessments had sound psychometric properties, κ =.87.

The immediate need for high reliability coefficients has been the demise of performance assessments in Kentucky.

As it has been Cronbach's Alfa reliability coefficient of factors are less but because total Alfa coefficient is high and has been approved, these factors are also approved.

Reliability coefficients indicate that all measures demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability.

In a meta - analysis of the often - used measure, Credé and Phillips (2011) reported a mean reliability coefficient of 0.77 for the TA scale across previously reported research.

Results showed high level of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient α = 0.90, test retest reliability ranged from r =.73 to r =.96 (ps <.01), item total correlation varying from r =.50 to r =.74 (ps <.01) and factor loading ranged from.39 to.73.

This is partly supported by the rather modest reliability coefficients obtained for both scales.

The results showed a valid and reliable scale with robust reliability coefficients that will use it to measure perceptions of quality in the relationship, and so contribute to research in psychology to reach an understanding of the nature of the duration, maintenance, repair, or even breaking them.

Diagnostic decisions were reviewed by the clinical rating team, with best - estimate judgments based on all available information.26 Orvaschel25 reported excellent κ value reliability coefficients for major depression and dysthymia in childeren.

The within - person omega reliability coefficient of this scale with the current sample was 0.88.

The CBCL and YSR have good construct validity and acceptable test — retest reliability coefficients among the subscales.

Results reported in Table 2 shows high level of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient on the scores of Urdu Passionate Love Scale (α =.90) which is quite good and high.

Internal consistency reliability coefficients for the health status scores ranged from 0.57 to 0.89.

Reliability coefficients at both intervals were robust and comparable to the original evaluation.

Reliability estimates, using split - half reliability coefficients, range from.83 to.97.

Two - week test - retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.74 to 0.87.

One - month test - retest reliability coefficients were.70 for Presence and.73 for Search.

Reliability coefficients for Parent, Teacher and Self rated SDQ in a community sample of 3 — 17 year old Chinese children

Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of the original PLS was reported α =.91.

The reliability coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) of the three family functioning FES subscale measures were slightly lower than reported by Moos (α =.62 for Family Cohesion, α =.59 for Family Expressiveness, and α =.63 for Family Conflict)(Saucier, Wilson, & Warka, 2007).

This is particularly pertinent when high - stakes decisions are to be based on (or in large part on) such scores, especially given some researchers are calling for reliability coefficients of.85 or higher to make such decisions (Haertel, 2013; Wasserman & Bracken, 2003).

Reliability coefficients:.79 -.94 for four major components and.95 -.98 for total scores; alternate form:.62 -.82 for components and.86 -.88 for total scores

The index was developed using a principle components analysis and alpha reliability coefficients.

Due to the ordinal and categorical nature of the response options, reliability was assessed using polychoric correlation - based version of the reliability coefficients.45 These analyses suggested satisfactory internal consistency for the SDQ total difficulties scale (α = 0.86) and for all subscales (α emotional problems = 0.82, conduct problems = 0.71, hyperactivity — inattention = 0.76, peer problems = 0.75 and prosocial behaviours = 0.77).

Based on the amount of reliability coefficient, Cronbach's Alfa of all factors is also with reliability 67.0 (Table 2).

As it has been seen, reliability coefficient of Cronbachʼs Alfa is approved in a high level (Table 3).

It has been used to assess stress among Singaporean adults and has good reliability coefficients.54

The alpha reliability coefficients are relatively high for all scales (Md = 91).

In phase II, internal consistency of the Urdu translated version of PLS was determined through test re-test reliability / cross language validation, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation.

Results indicated the good level of internal consistency in form of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient (α =.89).

In phase II, internal consistency was computed through test - retest reliability / cross language validation, Cronbach's's alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation.

Internal consistency was included the cross language validation, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation respectively.

Second objective of this study was to determine the internal consistency of the Urdu version of PLS through test re-tests reliability / cross language validation, Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation.