"School quality" refers to how good or high standard a school is, based on factors like academic performance, teaching quality, resources, facilities, safety, and overall student satisfaction.
Full definition
All in all, the issue is murky — perhaps because the measures
of school quality in the data are inadequate.
It may be that government will be more effective at establishing performance floors — much like they do in the arena of auto safety — rather than driving continuous improvement
in school quality.
In practice, teacher turnover appears to have negative effects
on school quality as measured by student performance.
This does not demonstrate that charter schools are superior to magnet schools, as we do not have any direct evidence
about school quality independent of parental perceptions.
It quickly became the indicator
for school quality when it was included with the district's enrollment guide in 2012.
The latter might sound good to advocates for greater school autonomy, but it has created many problems in terms of
charter school quality.
Yet there is very little evidence to date on the validity of inspection ratings and the effectiveness of inspection - based accountability systems in
improving school quality.
For years, critics have complained that the law's focus on test scores offers far too narrow a picture for
judging school quality.
In order to monitor the health of our schools, transparency around
school quality data must be increased.
The means used to implement accountability can support or undermine underlying goals and
overall school quality.
Given the historical relationship
between school quality and growth, it is possible to project the economic gains for each state from improving its schools by varying amounts.
This rating is an important factor in
understanding school quality because it measures whether or not all students are meeting academic standards.
Other factors include
local school quality, the ratio of local incomes to housing prices, neighborhood safety, amenities, demographic trends and long - term viability.
Confidence that spending more on schools would
enhance school quality fell by a similar amount, from 59 to 53 percent.
I first investigate whether inspection ratings convey any information on
school quality beyond what is captured by test - score rankings.
There are many channels through which principals
influence school quality, although the precise mechanisms likely vary across districts with the regulatory and institutional structures that define principal authority.
The results for Scenario 4 represent what happens if one state acts on its own to improve
school quality while all other states do not.
We don't dictate our values to parents, but we do ask parents to take an honest look at their own values and get smart about the
best school quality research.
At the secondary level, larger student populations may increase class sizes and strain school resources, thereby
lowering school quality and reducing the benefits of staying in school.
The major potential downside of this model occurs in jurisdictions that do not
monitor school quality carefully.
Also, having only one year of data from the new assessments means neither the district nor state can issue
school quality performance ratings this year.
The differences in performance then
reflect school quality rather than differences in ability or family background.
This pattern of results is consistent with the theory that management of teacher quality is an important pathway through which principals
affect school quality.
This research has demonstrated that
school quality does have an enormous impact on children's life chances.
The wrong response to recognizing that test scores fail to
capture school quality sufficiently is to increase the set of high - stakes measures we collect.
Because fifty years of research show that differences in
school quality only account for about a third of the variation in student achievement.
This is meant to complement, but not replace,
other school quality measures that include multiple factors, such as student growth rates.
But measured
school quality often varies dramatically within a school district, and therefore it is important to know whether individual schools differ in the relative success of advantaged and disadvantaged students.
For example, there are still legitimate debates over whether the state government or independent schools should make final decisions about the measures used to
define school quality and the credentials teachers should possess.
Public dialogue and legislative priorities are shifting to recognize that we can not
reduce school quality to one metric or data source.
Even parents who placed more value on school choices still didn't
take school quality as seriously as other issues.
This kind of
law school quality e-discovery education, if you could get it, would cost anywhere from $ 4,000 to $ 10,000.
Fifty percent
listed school quality as the most important neighborhood factor when buying, and 46 percent said that convenience to good schools was the most important thing when choosing a neighborhood.
In general, one would
think school quality would change rather slowly, thus being a fairly minor influence on quality - adjusted growth in human capital.
As I've written before, you can't manage quality if you can't predict it, and PM does not possess any tools to reliably
predict school quality.
Remote residential real estate investors require similar insight
into school quality since they're trusting someone else with their money.
Reports from school inspectors over the past year suggest that in
primary schools the quality of teaching is poorer in maths than in any other subject.
Unlike restaurants or supermarkets, where quality can be judged at the moment of the purchase,
school quality reveals itself later.
Phrases with «school quality»